Table D.1
Fit transit parameters for an independent analysis of each of the three transit-like events identified as AU Mic c in the TESS light curve.
| Event | T0 [TBJD] | P[d] | a∕R⋆ | Rp∕R⋆ | ip [°] | σ [ppm] | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1(a) | 1342.22 ± 0.03 | 30 ± 6 | 40 ± 8 | 0.028 ± 0.006 | 89.28 ± 0.45 | – | |
| 1 |  |
 |
 |
 |
 |
388 | |
| 2 |  |
 |
27 ± 6 |  |
 |
678 | |
| 3 | 2058.8672 ± 0.0004 |  |
 |
 |
 |
646 | |
| 1 |  |
 |
 |
 |
 |
355 | |
| 2 | 2040.0062 ± 0.0003 |  |
 |
0.0444 ± 0.0007 | 88.2 ± 0.2 | 650 | |
| 3 | 2058.8671 ± 0.0004 |  |
 |
0.0409 ± 0.0004 |  |
610 | |
Notes. The first row shows the previous results for Event 1 by Plavchan et al. (2020), the three following rows show the best fit parameters from our MCMC analysis of each event adopting an orbital period with an uniform prior of
d. The last three rows show the fit parameters using an orbital period with a normal prior of
d, as described in the text. (a)Fit parameters for Event 1 obtained by Plavchan et al. (2020).
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.