Free Access
Erratum
This article is an erratum for:
[https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201629507]


Issue
A&A
Volume 649, May 2021
Article Number C5
Number of page(s) 1
Section Numerical methods and codes
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201629507e
Published online 10 May 2021

We correct an error in Eq. (34) of Herenz & Wisotzki (2017), where we provided an estimate for the signal-to-noise ratio for an emission line that matches the 3D Gaussian filter template of LSDCat. The correct equation reads

S / N x , y , z 1 8 π 3 / 2 σ z σ G × F line σ ¯ Δ λ , $$ \begin{aligned} {S/N}_{x\prime ,{ y}\prime ,z\prime } \approx \frac{1}{\sqrt{8\pi ^{3/2} \sigma _z} \sigma _{\rm G}} \times \frac{F_{\rm line}}{\overline{\sigma } \Delta \lambda }, \end{aligned} $$(1)

that is, σG is not under the square root as presented in the paper. All previous steps that lead to this equation, that is, Eqs. (29)–(33), were correct.

As a consequence of this correction, the numerical value of the limiting flux in the MUSE HDF-S data at 7000 Å, given in Eq. (35) of our paper, was also incorrect. Inserting the given values (σG = 1.84 px, σz = 1.46, σ ¯ = 1.42 × 10 20 $ \overline{\sigma}=1.42\times 10^{-20} $ erg s−1 cm−2 Å−1, Δλ = 1.2 Å, and S/Ndet ≈ 8) into Eq. (1) delivers

log F line [ erg s 1 cm 2 ] 17.69 . $$ \begin{aligned} \log F_{\rm line}\,[\mathrm{erg\,s^{-1}\,cm^{-2}}] \approx -17.69. \end{aligned} $$(2)

Therefore Fig. 3, where the theoretical limiting flux was compared with the results of a source insertion and recovery experiment, also needs to be corrected. The corrected version of Fig. 3 is shown here in Fig. 1. The match between the experiment and theoretical expectation in Fig. 1 is closer in comparison to what was originally presented, so parts of the discussion in the final paragraph of Sect. 3.2 are thus obsolete.

thumbnail Fig. 1.

Completeness curve fC(log F [erg s−1 cm−2 Å−1]) from a fake source insertion and recovery experiment on the MUSE HDF-S datacube at 5000 Å. The dotted vertical line shows the 50% completeness limit at log F [erg s−1 cm−2]= − 17.75 and the dashed vertical line shows the analytically approximated minimum line flux given in Eq. (2) as log Fline [erg s−1 cm−2] ≈ − 17.69 at which LSDCat is expected to detect emission line sources in this experiment.

References

  1. Herenz, E. C., & Wisotzki, L. 2017, A&A, 602, A111 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]

© ESO 2021

All Figures

thumbnail Fig. 1.

Completeness curve fC(log F [erg s−1 cm−2 Å−1]) from a fake source insertion and recovery experiment on the MUSE HDF-S datacube at 5000 Å. The dotted vertical line shows the 50% completeness limit at log F [erg s−1 cm−2]= − 17.75 and the dashed vertical line shows the analytically approximated minimum line flux given in Eq. (2) as log Fline [erg s−1 cm−2] ≈ − 17.69 at which LSDCat is expected to detect emission line sources in this experiment.

In the text

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.