Table 5.
Parameters for scaling relation Mstar, 500 vs. Mgas, 500 (top panel in Fig. 17) for the samples by Chiu et al. (2018) and Lin et al. (2012).
| Sample | Pivot masses (M⊙) |
Best-fit-values |
Intrinsic scatter | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 |
 |
α | β | σ(%) | |
| Chiu+2018 | 6.13 × 1013 | 4.69 × 1012 | −0.011 ± 0.016 | 0.48 ± 0.12 | 32.3 ± 2.3 |
| Lin+2012 | 4.51 × 1013 | 4.71 × 1012 | −0.014 ± 0.015 | 0.64 ± 0.04 | 36.8 ± 2.7 |
Notes. We adopt 
and 
as the pivot masses; α, β, and σ are the best fit parameters as in Table 4.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.