Table 2.
Novel or newly characterized WD-OC pairs recovered in this analysis.
| GDR2 source ID | Associated cluster | PWD | log tcl | [Fe/H] | [M/H] | MWD | tcool |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (yr) | (M⊙) | (Gyr) | |||||
| 5856401252012633344 | ASCC 73 | 0.867 | 8.190 |
 |
 |
||
| 5825203021908148480 | ASCC 79 | 0.961 | 6.950 |
 |
 |
||
| 5826384584601681152 | ASCC 79 | 0.916 | 6.950 |
 |
 |
||
| 5825187834899772160 | ASCC 79 | 0.594 | 6.950 |
 |
 |
||
| 4092407537313874048 | ASCC 97 | 0.465 | 7.900 | 0.129 ± 0.166 |
 |
 |
|
| 5508976051738818176 | Alessi 3 | 0.995 | 8.870 | −0.275 ± 0.065 |
 |
 |
|
| 4853382867764646912 | Alessi 13 | 0.998 | 8.720 | 0.06 ± 0.15 |
 |
 |
|
| 4283928577215973120 | IC 4756 | 0.986 | 8.987 | −0.02 ± 0.01 |
 |
 |
|
| 6653447981289591808 | Mamajek 4 | 0.990 | 8.824 | 0.09 ± 0.08 |
 |
 |
|
| 5289447182180342016 | NGC 2516 (a) | 0.999 | 8.475 | 0.08 ± 0.01 |
 |
 |
|
| 5294015515555860608 | NGC 2516 (a) | 0.998 | 8.475 | 0.08 ± 0.01 |
 |
 |
|
| 5597682038533250304 | NGC 2527 | 0.996 | 8.910 | −0.1 ± 0.04 | – | – | |
| 5340220262646771712 | NGC 3532 | 0.989 | 8.650 | −0.07 ± 0.10 |
 |
 |
|
| 4476643725433841920 | NGC 6633 | 0.532 | 8.900 | −0.098 ± 0.037 |
 |
 |
|
| 2166915179559503232 | NGC 6991 | 0.998 | 9.100 | 0.0 ± 0.03 |
 |
 |
|
| 4183928888026931328 | Ruprecht 147 | 0.996 | 9.330 | 0.16 ± 0.08 |
 |
 |
|
| 4183926006112672768 | Ruprecht 147 | 0.955 | 9.330 | 0.16 ± 0.08 |
 |
 |
|
| 506514907785623040 | Stock 2 | 0.939 | 8.500 | −0.06 ± 0.03 |
 |
 |
|
| 508276703371724928 | Stock 2 | 0.980 | 8.500 | −0.06 ± 0.03 |
 |
 |
|
| 507054806657042944 | Stock 2 | 0.999 | 8.500 | −0.06 ± 0.03 |
 |
 |
|
| 507105143670906624 | Stock 2 | 0.976 | 8.500 | −0.06 ± 0.03 |
 |
 |
|
| 507119265523387136 | Stock 2 | 0.995 | 8.500 | −0.06 ± 0.03 | – | – | |
| 507555904779576064 | Stock 2 | 0.977 | 8.500 | −0.06 ± 0.03 |
 |
 |
|
| 506862078583709056 | Stock 2 | 0.999 | 8.500 | −0.06 ± 0.03 |
 |
 |
|
| 458778927573447168 | Stock 2 | 0.997 | 8.500 | −0.06 ± 0.03 |
 |
 |
|
| 507362012775415552 | Stock 2 | 0.990 | 8.500 | −0.06 ± 0.03 |
 |
 |
|
| 507414067782288896 | Stock 2 | 0.984 | 8.500 | −0.06 ± 0.03 |
 |
 |
|
| 458066409683198336 | Stock 2 | 0.994 | 8.500 | −0.06 ± 0.03 |
 |
 |
|
| 463937282075547648 | Stock 2 | 0.994 | 8.500 | −0.06 ± 0.03 |
 |
 |
|
| 507128332197081344 | Stock 2 | 0.861 | 8.500 | −0.06 ± 0.03 |
 |
 |
|
| 507277870080186624 | Stock 2 | 0.899 | 8.500 | −0.06 ± 0.03 | – | – | |
| 506864793008901632 | Stock 2 | 0.698 | 8.500 | −0.06 ± 0.03 |
 |
 |
|
| 507221863701989248 | Stock 2 | 0.887 | 8.500 | −0.06 ± 0.03 | – | – | |
| 1992469104239732096 | Stock 12 | 0.999 | 8.450 |
 |
 |
Notes. PWD is the probability of the object being a WD, adopted from Gentile Fusillo et al. (2019), log tcl is the cluster age, and [Fe/H]/[M/H] is the cluster metallicity. Assuming that all recovered WDs are of the DA type, MWD and tcool are WD mass and WD cooling age estimates, respectively.
Recovered in Holt et al. (2019) but not characterized. Missing values of MWD and tcool for some objects are due to GDR2 photometry problems for these objects.
References. OC metallicities: Bagdonas et al. (2018), Baratella et al. (2020), Carrera et al. (2019), Conrad et al. (2014), Fritzewski et al. (2019), Netopil et al. (2016), Netopil (2017), Reddy & Lambert (2019), Zhang et al. (2019).
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.