Free Access

This article has an erratum: [https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202038590e]


Table 1.

Summary of the accretion-to-jet energy conversion efficiencies discussed in the text.

GW170817 measured η/10−3 68% C.I.
Any Mdisc 1.2 0.2 – 8.2
Mdisc >  0.04 M 0.6 0.1 – 2.6

Blandford-Znajek, fitting formulae (a)

McKinney (2005) 0.8 0.5 – 1.7
Hawley et al. (2007) 6.8 5.8 – 7.0
MAD (b) 380 375 – 381

Blandford-Znajek, BNS simulations

Christie et al. (2019, BT) ∼0.46
Christie et al. (2019, BPW) ∼9.4
Christie et al. (2019, BPS) ∼28
Ruiz et al. (2019, 2020) ∼2–3(c)

mechanism, GW170817

Zalamea & Beloborodov (2011) 0.40 0.19 – 0.58

Notes. The first two entries represent the efficiency measured in this work. Other entries represent theoretical expectations for the Blandford & Znajek (1977) and annihilation mechanisms, either applied directly to GW170817 or based on simulations of generic BNS mergers. When applicable, we report both the median value and the 68% confidence interval.

(a)

Based on GRMHD simulations of geometrically thick accretion discs around rotating BHs, seeded with poloidal magnetic fields (see the caveats in Sect. 5.1). The fitting formulae are evaluated at the GW170817 remnant BH spin (see Appendix A).

(c)

These values represent the instantaneous efficiency Ljet/c2 at the end of the simulation.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.