Table A.1.
Model variations of the assumptions that affect the binary population specifically as well as our whole stellar population.
Model | Description | Slope of | Slope of equivalent | Ratio of hydrogen-rich | 103 × prob. of |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
in Z17 | MHe, preSN | single-star | progenitors with | 0 high mass | |
distribution, | IMF distribution, | high mass cores, | detections, | ||
αHe | αsingle_IMF | Rmassive | P0, massive × 103 | ||
– | FIDUCIAL POPULATION (standard set of assumptions) | –1.89 | –2.20 | 0.2 | 4.6 |
– | Population of only single stars (standard set of assumptions) | −2.01 | −2.35 | 0.18 | 9.0 |
Variations of assumptions affecting the binary population | |||||
– Parameters of stable mass transfer | |||||
01 | Accretion efficiency β = 0 | −2.22 | −2.62 | 0.16 | 12.6 |
02 | Accretion efficiency β = 0.2 | −2.04 | −2.38 | 0.18 | 8.6 |
03 | Accretion efficiency β = 1 | −1.34 | −1.50 | 0.26 | 1.0 |
04 | Angular momentum loss γ = 0 | −1.80 | −2.08 | 0.22 | 3.0 |
05 | Angular momentum loss γ: circumbinary disk | −1.91 | −2.22 | 0.19 | 6.1 |
– SN kick | |||||
10 | No natal kick in SNe, σkick = 0 | −2.25 | −2.66 | 0.17 | 11.3 |
11 | Extremely high kick in SNe, σkick = ∞ | −1.88 | −2.19 | 0.21 | 4.2 |
– Common envelope evolution | |||||
12 | αCE = 0.1 | −2.26 | −2.66 | 0.16 | 12.4 |
13 | αCE = 0.2 | −2.12 | −2.49 | 0.18 | 8.6 |
14 | αCE = 0.5 | −1.87 | −2.17 | 0.21 | 4.0 |
15 | αCE = 2.0 | −1.86 | −2.16 | 0.21 | 3.6 |
16 | αCE = 5.0 | −1.60 | −1.83 | 0.24 | 1.6 |
17 | αCE = 10.0 | −1.47 | −1.67 | 0.26 | 1.1 |
18 | λCE = 0.5 | −2.02 | −2.36 | 0.20 | 4.9 |
– Parameter space for unstable mass transfer and mergers | |||||
19 | qcrit, MS = 0.25 | −1.90 | −2.21 | 0.20 | 4.5 |
20 | qcrit, MS = 0.8 | −1.90 | −2.21 | 0.20 | 4.5 |
21 | qcrit, HG = 0.0 | −1.90 | −2.20 | 0.20 | 4.6 |
22 | qcrit, HG = 0.25 | −1.83 | −2.12 | 0.21 | 3.5 |
23 | qcrit, HG = 0.8 | −1.94 | −2.26 | 0.18 | 8.6 |
24 | qcrit, HG = 1.0 | −1.95 | −2.28 | 0.17 | 10.2 |
06 | Merger μloss = 0 | −1.86 | −2.15 | 0.21 | 3.8 |
07 | Merger μloss = 0.25 | −1.87 | −2.17 | 0.20 | 4.4 |
08 | Merger μmix = 0 | −1.90 | −2.21 | 0.20 | 4.5 |
09 | Merger μmix = 1 | −1.89 | −2.20 | 0.20 | 4.4 |
27 | WD mergers exclusion if not massive companion | −1.75 | −2.02 | 0.22 | 3.1 |
– Initial binary distributions | |||||
35 | Initial q distr. slope κ = −1 | −1.90 | −2.20 | 0.20 | 5.1 |
36 | Initial q distr. slope κ = +1 | −1.87 | −2.17 | 0.21 | 3.8 |
37 | Initial period distr. slope π = +1 | −1.97 | −2.30 | 0.19 | 6.8 |
38 | Initial period distr. slope π = −1 | −1.88 | −2.18 | 0.20 | 5.2 |
– Binary fraction | |||||
45 | fbin = 0.3 | −1.98 | −2.32 | 0.18 | 7.6 |
(55) | fbin = 0.5 | −1.96 | −2.28 | 0.19 | 6.6 |
00 | fbin = 0.7 | −1.93 | −2.22 | 0.19 | 5.8 |
47 | Mass dependent binary fraction, fbin(M) | −1.96 | −2.29 | 0.19 | 6.3 |
Variations of assumptions affecting the entire population | |||||
– Exclusion of failed SNe | |||||
(52) | Mmax, ccSN ∼ 15 M⊙ | −2.02 | −2.45 | 0.29 (a) | 1000.0 (b) |
(53) | Mmax, ccSN ∼ 16.5 M⊙ | −2.02 | −2.42 | 0.2 (a) | 1000.0 (b) |
(54) | Mmax, ccSN ∼ 18 M⊙ | −2.01 | −2,40 | 0.18 (a) | 580.7 (b) |
29 | Mmax, ccSN ∼ 20 M⊙ | −1.97 | −2.33 | 0.13 (a) | 67.8 (b) |
– Minimum mass for SNe | |||||
30 | Mmin, ccSN ∼ 7 M⊙ | −1.88 | −2.20 | 0.19 | 7.9 |
31 | Mmin, ccSN ∼ 8 M⊙ | −1.89 | −2.18 | 0.22 | 3.0 |
– IMF slope for massive stars | |||||
32 | αIMF = −1.6 | −1.36 | −1.53 | 0.28 | 0.6 |
33 | αIMF = −2.7 | −2.21 | −2.61 | 0.17 | 11.9 |
34 | αIMF = −3.0 | −2.44 | −2.90 | 0.14 | 22.6 |
– Wind efficiency | |||||
(51) | Wind factor η = 0.1 | −1.76 | −1.98 | 0.32 | 0.3 |
25 | Wind factor η = 0.33 | −1.80 | −2.04 | 0.30 | 0.4 |
(52) | Wind factor η = 0.5 | −1.80 | −2.04 | 0.30 | 0.4 |
(53) | Wind factor η = 1.5 | −2.12 | −2.50 | 0.12 | 48.7 |
(54) | Wind factor η = 2.0 | −3.56 | −4.35 | 0.01 | 875.5 |
26 | Wind factor η = 3.0 | −4.02 | −4.95 | 0.00 | 879.1 |
– Metallicity | |||||
40 | Z = 0.001 | −1.80 | −2.07 | 0.29 | 0.6 |
42 | Z = 0.008 | −1.78 | −2.05 | 0.27 | 1.0 |
44 | Z = 0.03 | −2.59 | −3.10 | 0.03 | 404.2 |
Notes. We show the slope of the distribution of final helium cores, αHe, as well as the corresponding IMF slope of a single-star population, αsingle_IMF. Rmassive is the fraction of hydrogen-rich stars at collapse with cores more massive than 5.75 M⊙ that corresponds to a single star of 16.5 M⊙ (Smartt et al. 2009), which has been suggested lead to “failed” SNe. P0, massive is the possibility of having zero progenitor detections of these high core mass progenitors out of 26 observational trials by chance. In the first column we show the model number of each variation, which corresponds to a simulation of Z17 in case it is not in parenthesis. Bold values represent the fiducial simulation that is used as a reference throughout the study.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.