Table 4
Polarization obtained for alternative values of dlos reported in the literature.
| Target |  (a) |
Pother (b) |  (c) |
Ref. (d) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (pc) | (%) | (%) | ||
| MC2 | −29.7−7.3 | 50−53 | 9−10 | A |
| Bridge B2 | −6.9−6.9 | ≤84 | ≤42 | A |
| Bridge E | −13.7–13.7 | ≤83 | ≤45 | A |
| G0.11-0.11 | −3.1–3.1 | ≤93 | ≤26 | A |
| Sgr B2 | −50–−47 | 61−83 | 24−33 | B |
| Sgr C1 | −0.61–47 | 50–99.9 | 16–32 | C |
| Sgr C2 | −38–−25 | 50–54 | 14–16 | C |
Notes. (a) Range of dlos from the quoted references. (b) Range of polarization degree corresponding to dlos, obtained from Eqs. (1) and (2). (c)Range of diluted polarization degree obtained from the values of Table 3 (d) A: Capelli et al. (2012), B: Walls et al. (2016), and C: Chuard et al. (2018).
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.