Table 6.
Results for the 20 open clusters in the sample.
Cluster | iDR4 stars |
Members |
Giant outliers |
Li-rich giants |
NG outliers |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
All | With Li | Li > 10 | # | %(All) | %(with Li) | #(All) | %(Li > 10) (a) | #(All) | %(Li > 10) (a) | #(All) | %(Li > 10) | |
ρ Oph | 311 | 236 | 228 | 45 | 14 | 19 | 90 | 39 | 2 | 1 | 48(75) (b) | 21(33) |
Cha I | 713 | 512 | 490 | 85 | 12 | 16 | 247 | 50 | 9 | 2 | 44(76) | 9(16) |
γ Vel | 1273 | 915 | 877 | 210 | 16 | 23 | 506 | 45 | 14 | 2 | 13(14) | 1(2) |
NGC 2547 | 456 | 306 | 297 | 107 | 23 | 35 | 122 | 37 | 3 | 1 | ... | 0 |
IC 2391 | 421 | 383 | 368 | 27 | 6 | 7 | 253 | 68 | 10 | 3 | 18(67) | 5(18) |
IC 2602 | 1831 | 1580 | 1545 | 32 | 2 | 2 | 1212 | 73 | 28 | 2 | 138(303) | 9(20) |
IC 4665 | 566 | 446 | 406 | 37(40) | 7(7) | 8(9) | 133 | 30 | 2 | 0 | 168(244) | 41(60) |
NGC 2516 | 764 | 462 | 378 | 298 | 40 | 65 | 70 | 17 | 0 | 0 | 59 | 16 |
NGC 6705 | 757 | 340 | 339 | 163 | 22 | 48 | 19 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 166 | 49 |
NGC 4815 | 202 | 58 | 53 | 29 | 14 | 50 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 23 | 43 |
NGC 6633 | 1647 | 396 | 377 | 101(118) | 6(7) | 26(30) | 590 | 15 | 13 | 2 | 186 | 49 |
Trumpler 23 | 148 | 32 | 29 | 17 | 11 | 53 | 4 | 14 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 38 |
Berkeley 81 | 271 | 91 | 88 | 28 | 10 | 31 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 60 | 68 |
NGC 6005 | 557 | 108 | 98 | 38 | 7 | 35 | 17 | 17 | 1 | 1 | 62 | 63 |
NGC 6802 | 191 | 42 | 41 | 22 | 12 | 52 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 14 | 34 |
Pismis 18 | 124 | 40 | 35 | 15 | 12 | 38 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 23 | 66 |
Trumpler 20 | 1394 | 255 | 223 | 124 | 9 | 49 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 122 | 55 |
Berkeley 44 | 93 | 50 | 50 | 22 | 24 | 44 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 28 | 56 |
M67 | 25 | 20 | 9 | 18(19) | 72(76) | 90(95) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 11 |
NGC 2243 | 749 | 134 | 121 | 36 | 5 | 27 | 7 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 90 | 74 |
Notes. The table indicates, for each cluster: all stars (both UVES and GIRAFFE) from the GES sample; the number of stars detected with measured EW(Li) values and those with EW(Li) > 10; and the number of stars selected as candidate members, and giant and NG field contaminants. Regarding member stars, we provide their percentages with respect to all GES stars, and to those with a EW(Li) measurement in the field of each cluster. Percentages in parenthesis also take into account the number of possible candidates for each cluster (see Table 5 and the individual notes in Appendix A.). In the case of the giant and NG contaminants, we consider percentages with respect to all stars with EW(Li) > 10 mÅ only, given the criteria specified in Sect. 4 to select outliers. (a)We note that, given that the selection criteria for Li-rich and non-Li-rich giants makes use of A(Li) instead of EW(Li), the percentages of the giant contaminants only correspond to those stars dislaying a lithium line, and not to the totality of the giant contaminant selection. (b)Between parentheses we indicate the total of NG outliers, taking the potential NGs in the 1.01 > γ > 1.0 range into account.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.