Table 2
Blind tests: configuration and results.
Planet | Peak | Pfit=Ptrue | Colour | Detection of | Detection of | Detection | Bias on |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
configuration | significance | code | true planet | false planet | status | statistics | |
No injection | |||||||
Good | – | Red | – | Yes | False positive | nb./prop. | |
Detection of | |||||||
non-existent planet | |||||||
Bad | – | Black | – | No | Good recovery | No bias | |
Injection | |||||||
Good | Yes | Green | Yes | No | Good recovery | No bias | |
Good | No | Brown | No | Yes | Wrong planet | prop. | |
Bad | Yes | Orange | No | No | Rejection of | nb./prop. | |
true planet | |||||||
Bad | No | Blue | No | No | Missed planet | nb./prop. | |
Notes. The peak significance is based on the FAP (bootstrap of the signal, 1% level). “Pfit=Ptrue” means that the difference between the two is lower than a certain threshold (see text). The colour code corresponds to Fig. 17. The bias on planet statistics can either be on the number of detected planets or on their properties (in particular the orbital period).
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.