Table 3.
Comparison of our DPS to other similar works with respect to the selection procedure of this work.
| Previous work | Cross matched samples | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sample | Size | RCSED | Preliminary candidates | DP candidates | DPS |
| Wang et al. (2009) | (87) | 83 | 82 | 75 | 58 |
| Liu et al. (2010) | (167) | 135 | 129 | 114 | 73 |
| Smith et al. (2010) | (148) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Ge et al. (2012) G12-DP | (3 030) | 2 794 | 1 255 | 1 179 | 947 |
| Ge et al. (2012) G12-TFAS | (12 582) | 11 475 | 6 277 | 3 585 | 2 967 |
Notes. We present the comparison of our DPS to other similar works with respect to the selection procedure of this work. We show in the first column the reference of the sample and the size in the second. In the third column, we show a cross-match with the RCSED catalogue (Chilingarian et al. 2017). We display the number of galaxies found in the preliminary candidate sample, the DP candidates and the final DP galaxies in the last three columns, respectively (see Sects. 2.2.1, 2.2.2 and 2.2.5).
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.