Impact of the strength of evaporation on the transition. The figure is analogous to Fig. 4 but for simulation E1 (top panels) and E2 (bottom panels) where the evaporation rate is uniformly reduced (E1) respectively increased (E2) by a factor 10 relative to the nominal case. The transition mass and radius were again fit with a power law for M_bare and R_bare as shown with the thick red line. The power law exponents for the dependency on the distance have remained similar as in the reference case M3, but the absolute value of M_bare is reduced in E1 (weak evaporation) relative to M3 by a factor 2.02, and a factor 1.20 for R_bare. In E2 (strong evaporation), M_bare and R_bare have increased by a factor 1.82 and 1.18, respectively. The thinner gray line shows the transition mass and radius in the nominal simulation M0 to allow direct comparison. M3 is in turn very similar to M0.