EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 635 (March 2020) A&A, 635 (2020) L10 Full HTML
Free Access
Issue
A&A
Volume 635, March 2020
Article Number L10
Number of page(s) 6
Section Letters to the Editor
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201937155
Published online 12 March 2020

© ESO 2020

1. Introduction

The brightest cluster galaxies (BCGs) are excellent laboratories to study the effect of a dense galaxy cluster environment on galaxy evolution. BCGs have exceptional masses and luminosities. In the local Universe, they are indeed commonly associated with passively evolving massive ellipticals of cD type, which often host radio galaxies (Zirbel 1996), and are located at the center of the cluster cores (Lauer et al. 2014).

Present day star-forming BCGs (>40 M⊙ yr−1), such as the famous Perseus A and Cygnus A (Fraser-McKelvie et al. 2014), have been commonly found in cool-core clusters (Reynolds & Fabian 1996; Fabian et al. 2006). This suggests that large-scale flows of gas regulate their star formation and are often moderated or suppressed by active galactic nuclei (AGN) feedback. Some studies of local and intermediate-z BCGs have indeed found molecular gas reservoirs to fuel the star formation (Edge 2001; Salomé & Combes 2003; Hamer et al. 2012; McDonald et al. 2014; McNamara et al. 2014; Russell et al. 2014; Tremblay et al. 2016; Fogarty et al. 2019) as well as flows of cold gas, which is often in filaments (Salomé et al. 2006; Olivares et al. 2019; Russell et al. 2019).

Little is known about the formation history of BCGs. They are commonly believed to evolve via the dry accretion of satellite galaxies (Collins et al. 2009; Stott et al. 2011), which is consistent with recent studies proposing that BCGs grow by at factor of ∼2 in stellar mass since z ∼ 1 (Lidman et al. 2012; Zhang et al. 2016). However, most of the BCG stellar mass is assembled at higher redshifts (z ∼ 3−5) in smaller sources, which are then later swallowed by the BCG (De Lucia & Blaizot 2007).

Recent studies have even proposed that the star formation in distant z ≳ 1 BCGs is driven by gas-rich major mergers, resulting in high star formation and large reservoirs of molecular gas in BCGs at high z ≥ 1 (McDonald et al. 2016; Webb et al. 2015a,b; Bonaventura et al. 2017), which is a scenario where star formation is fed by rapid gas deposition in distant BCGs and slow cooling flows at low-z. In this work, we tested this scenario at z = 1.7 by mapping the sturbursting core and the BCG (SFR = 860 ± 130 M⊙ yr−1, Webb et al. 2015b) of the distant cluster SpARCS1049+56 in CO.

SpARCS1049+56 is one of the most distant and massive clusters (e.g., Stanford et al. 2012; Brodwin et al. 2012; Newman et al. 2014; Gobat et al. 2013) with weak-lensing and richness-based (estimated within 500 kpc) masses of (3.5 ± 1.2)×1014 M⊙ and (3.8 ± 1.2)×1014 M⊙, respectively (Andreon & Congdon 2014; Webb et al. 2015b; Finner et al. 2020), which are consistent with each other. Webb et al. (2017) recently detected CO(2→1) with the Large Millimeter Telescope (LMT), which is associated with a large reservoir (∼1011 M⊙) of molecular gas that is possibly associated with the BCG and/or its nearby cluster core companions within the 25 arcsec diameter (i.e., ∼200 kpc at z = 1.7) beam of the LMT. By spatially resolving, both in continuum and in CO, the BCG from each of its nearby companions separately, the present study is one of the first to probe both molecular gas and dust reservoirs of z ≳ 1 BCGs in detail (Emonts et al. 2013, 2016; Coogan et al. 2018; Strazzullo et al. 2018; Castignani et al. 2019). We thus aim to unveil the mechanisms at play for the assembly and the star formation fueling of the most distant BCGs.

Throughout this work, we adopt a flat ΛCDM cosmology with matter density Ωm = 0.30, dark energy density ΩΛ = 0.70, and Hubble constant h = H0/100 km s−1 Mpc−1 = 0.70 (see however, Planck Collaboration VI 2018; Riess et al. 2019). The luminosity distance at the redshift of the BCG is 12 811 Mpc (i.e., 1″ = 8.46 kpc). The paper is structured as follows. In Sect. 2 we describe our NOEMA observations and data reduction; in Sect. 3 we show our results. In Sect. 4 we discuss our results and draw our conclusions. In Appendix A, we report the formulas adopted to estimate H2 and the dust masses.

2. NOEMA 1.8 mm observations and data reduction

We observed the SpARCS1049+56 BCG with NOEMA for four days in November 2018 (4, 15, 16, and 24 November) in C configuration using ten antennas, as part of the program S18CL (PI: Combes). The total time spent on-source is 14.2 h. We set the phase center of the observations equal to the BCG coordinates RA = and Dec = . We also adopted a tuning frequency of 170.2 GHz, which corresponds to the observer frame frequency of the redshifted CO(4→3) line, given that our target BCG is at z = 1.709 (Webb et al. 2015b, 2017).

The baseline range was 20–320 m. The program was executed in good to typical winter weather conditions, with a system temperature of Tsys = 150−250 K and a precipitable water vapor column of ∼2−3 mm and ∼5−7 mm. We used the new PolyFix correlator, which covers a total bandwidth of 15.5 GHz split between the lower and upper side band, covering the ranges between 154.2–158.3 GHz and 169.7–173.8 GHz, respectively. The sources 1125+596, 0954+556 were used as phase and amplitude calibrators, while 3C84 and 3C279 served as bandwidth and flux calibrators. We reduced the data using the clic package from the GILDAS software. The final (u,v) tables correspond to 20.3 h of integration (14.2 h on source).

We imaged the visibilities using the software mapping of GILDAS. At the tuning frequency of 170.2 GHz, the half power primary beam width is 29.6″. We adopted natural weighting, yielding a synthesized beam of 1.2″ × 1.0″ with PA = 82°. We then rebinned the spectral axis at a resolution of 20 km s−1 (∼11.4 MHz at 170.2 GHz). The resulting root mean square (rms) is 0.55 mJy beam−1.

3. Results

3.1. CO(4→3) emission line sources

Our upper side band NOEMA observations are sensitive to the CO(4→3) line from cluster members within a 16 arcsec radius (i.e., 135 kpc) from the BCG and in the redshift range between z = 1.65−1.72, which corresponds to velocities ∼ ± 2000 km s−1 with respect to the BCG. Surprisingly, no CO(4→3) emission line was found to be associated with the BCG. However, by inspecting the NOEMA data cube, we detected two sources in the upper side band in the field of the BCG at (RA;Dec) = () and (). No emission line detection was found in the lower side band, which is sensitive to CO(4→3) from sources within z = 1.91−1.99. In Fig. 1 we show moment 0, 1, and 2 maps. The intensity map shows the two detected sources, which are about ±2 arcsec to the northeast and southeast from the BCG. They also show a clear separation in velocity, being located at ∼+130 km s−1 and ∼ − 60 km s−1 with respect to the BCG, respectively. The moment 2 map shows similar extensions of ∼150–250 km s−1 in CO(4→3) for the two sources along the spectral axis. Tentative evidence for line broadening was found from the periphery down to the center of the northern source, while an opposite trend was observed for the southern companion. The two sources remain unresolved by our NOEMA observations. However, the southern source shows evidence for a southern extension, which is visible from the intensity map. The velocity map also indicates that this southern tail may be receding with a velocity ≳100 km s−1 with respect to the main source, while the recession seems to disappear at the very end of the tail. The velocity gradient suggests that the southern extension is associated with a bent tail of molecular gas. Similarly, the southern part of the northern CO emitting source seems to approach us with a relative velocity ≲100 km s−1 with respect to the main component. The velocity gradients are overall small, suggesting that both northern and southern CO companions of the BCG are seen almost face-on.

thumbnail Fig. 1.

NOEMA CO(4→3) observations. a: intensity, b: velocity, and c: velocity dispersion maps derived from the moments 0, 1, and 2, respectively. Panel d: continuum map. Coordinates are reported as angular separations from the BCG. For each map, the velocity range that is considered corresponds to the velocity support of the CO(4→3) line. Solid contour levels are superimposed to both the intensity and continuum maps. They correspond to significance levels of 3, 10, and 15σ (panel a) as well as 3 and 4σ (panel d). The dashed ellipses at the bottom right corner of each panel show the beam size.
Open with DEXTER

3.2. Molecular gas mass and excitation ratio of the BCG companions

Figure 2 displays the CO(4→3) spectrum for both the northern and southern companions of the BCG, which are considered separately, and for the system of the two, which are considered altogether, within the ∼10 arcsec2 region that encompasses the two sources. Our Gaussian fit yields an estimated velocity integrated flux SCO(4 → 3)Δv = (2.9 ± 0.3) Jy km s−1, a full width at half maximum FWHM = (319 ± 39) km s−1, and a redshift of 1.7089 ± 0.0002 for the system of the two CO emitting sources. The redshift is fully consistent with z = 1.7091 ± 0.0004, which is inferred by Webb et al. (2017) with CO(2→1) LMT observations of the BCG system, which was unresolved by the LMT with a 25 arcsec beam.

thumbnail Fig. 2.

Baseline subtracted spectra of northern (top left) and southern (top right) sources, and the system of the two (bottom). In the panels, the solid line shows the Gaussian best fit to the CO(4→3) line. The vertical scale is in Jy.
Open with DEXTER

By using Eq. (A.1), we also estimated a total velocity integrated luminosity of , which we compared to found by Webb et al. (2017) with the LMT. The ratio between the two yields an excitation ratio of , which is lower than the value ∼0.5, which is typically found for distant star-forming galaxies (Carilli & Walter 2013). Webb et al. (2017) also find that CO(2→1) FWHM = (569 ± 63) km s−1, which is a factor of ∼1.8 higher than what we find with our NOEMA observation, which is typical of massive star-forming galaxies.

It is likely that the CO(2→1) emission reported by the authors is due to a number of cluster members within the LMT beam of 25″, which we did not detect, individually, with the smaller beam of ∼1″ of our observations. In this case, the r42 excitation ratio for the BCG companions would be in better agreement with the typical values from the literature.

We estimated the total H2 gas mass by using Eq. (A.2) as well as by assuming a Galactic CO-to-H2 conversion factor αCO = 4.36 M⊙ (K km s−1 pc2)−1, an excitation ratio r21 = 0.85 (Carilli & Walter 2013), and by Webb et al. (2017), which was rescaled by a factor of 1/1.8. This yields MH2 = (3.3 ± 0.3)×1011 M⊙, a factor of ∼3 higher than what Webb et al. (2017) report. We stress that the authors adopted a lower αCO = 0.8 M⊙ (K km s−1 pc2)−1 than the Galactic one used in this work. Therefore, the factor of (4.36/1.8)/0.8 ∼ 3 difference between the two mass estimates is ultimately due to the different CO-to-H2 conversions adopted in the two studies and to the rescaling factor used in this work.

The relative contribution of the northern and southern BCG companions to the total CO(4→3) flux is found to be ∼20% and ∼30%, which imply H2 masses of ∼7 × 1010 M⊙ and ∼1 × 1011 M⊙, respectively. The sum of the CO(4→3) emission from the northern and southern components accounts for ∼50% of the total. This suggests that the remaining ∼50% is likely due to diffuse emission from gas that has been stripped from cluster core galaxies. In Table 1 we summarize our results.

Table 1.

CO(4→3) results for the northern and southern components and the system of the two, denoted as Total.

3.3. Continuum emission at 1.8 mm and dust masses of the BCG companions

We further investigate the presence of submillimiter sources in the field of the BCG. By using the entire lower side band, we looked for possible continuum emission with an rms  = 22 μJy. Figure 1d displays the corresponding continuum map in which two detections are at ∼(3−4)σ, which are associated with the southern companion of the BCG and its southern tail, with an associated total flux of ∼0.2 mJy. The continuum map does not show any detection that is either associated with the northern companion of the BCG or with the BCG itself. Nevertheless, NOEMA observations allowed us to set a robust 3σ upper limit of 66 μJy to the dust continuum of the BCG at 1.8 mm in the observer frame. Remarkably, this upper limit is in agreement with the expected value ∼0.1 mJy, which was inferred using the spectral energy distribution modeling by Trudeau et al. (2019) that is based on low-radio frequency and far-infrared data-points.

We used the continuum map to estimate a dust mass Md = (2.2 ± 1.1)×108 M⊙ for the southern companion of the BCG and its tail, which is similar to those previously found for distant star-forming galaxies (Berta et al. 2016). We report a fiducial 50% error in Md in order to take the uncertainties in the continuum flux and continuum to dust mass conversion into account. For the BCG, we set a 3σ upper limit of Md <  7.2 × 107 M⊙. For our estimates, we used Eq. (A.6) which is based on previous studies by Scoville et al. (2014, 2016) on distant star-forming galaxies. We adopted a dust temperature equal to Td = (44 ± 5) K, which was inferred by Webb et al. (2015b) by modeling the infrared spectral energy distribution of the unresolved BCG system. The Spitzer MIPS 24 μm contours that are overplotted in the center and right panels of Fig. 3 indeed show that the BCG and their nearby companions are unresolved in the far-infrared.

thumbnail Fig. 3.

HST (left; RGB image: the F105W filter is in blue and green, F160W in red), VLA 1.5 GHz (center), and VLA 10 GHz (right) images of the BCG and its surroundings taken from Trudeau et al. (2019). North is up, east is left. The CO(4→3) contours are overplotted in blue, as in Fig. 1a. Small shifts of 0.3 and 0.6 arcsec toward the east and north, respectively, are applied to the NOEMA contours, which is consistent with GCS catalog uncertainties in the absolute astrometry used by HST. In the central and right panels, the radio contours (3, 4, and 5σ levels) are in cyan and the Spitzer MIPS 24 μm contours are shown in beige.
Open with DEXTER

3.4. Molecular gas mass reservoir of the BCG

Neither CO(4→3) nor continuum emission was found at the location of the BCG. However, by using Eqs. (A.1), (A.2), we set a 3σ upper limit for the H2 molecular gas mass of the BCG that is equal to MH2 <  1.1 × 1010 M⊙, corresponding to . We adopted a resolution of 300 km s−1, a Galactic CO-to-H2 conversion factor αCO = 4.36 M⊙ (K km s−1 pc2)−1, and an excitation ratio r41 = 0.46 (Carilli & Walter 2013). By using Eq. (A.8) and the upper limit of the BCG continuum, we also set a 3σ upper limit MH2 <  1.7 × 1010 M⊙, which is consistent with what was obtained from the nondetection in CO(4→3).

4. Discussion and conclusions

Figure 3 displays the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) and Very Large Array (VLA) radio images of the BCG and its nearby companions. In the left panel, the cluster members are highlighted and they have been spectroscopically confirmed by Webb et al. (2015b). Interestingly, the northern CO emitting source is coincident with a pair of merging cluster members. With this work, we also spectroscopically confirm the southern CO emitting source as a new cluster galaxy, with a clear HST counterpart. Interestingly, this source is also coincident with the Spitzer MIPS peak at 24 μm in the observer frame (Fig. 3, center and right panels). The combination of the Spitzer contours and our CO observations shows that the MIPS infrared emission does not come from the BCG itself, but mainly from the southern CO source, as previously suggested by Webb et al. (2015b).

The southern galaxy and its tail, which were both detected by us in CO and in continuum, are also spatially aligned at the start of a long chain of clumpy sources, which originates from the BCG system and broadens toward the southwest. Webb et al. (2015b) suggest that the stream, which is clearly visible by HST in the NIR (rest frame UV and optical), is associated with a tidal tail that originates within the stellar envelope of the BCG from a less massive spectroscopically confirmed merging system. Our observations now confirm that the tip of the stream is linked to a gas rich companion of the BCG, which is possibly infalling along the stream into the cluster core and thus the BCG itself. In this case, the infall should occur with a relative velocity that is almost perfectly in the plane of the sky since the line-of-sight velocity is negligible (Figs. 1b and 2) when compared to the cluster velocity dispersion, which is on the order of several 100 km s−1 for massive clusters. The cospatial dust continuum and CO tails strengthen our interpretation and suggest that the high intra-cluster medium (ICM) density ρICM and high source velocity v, as often observed in cluster cores, may favor ram pressure p ∼ ρv2 to strip off the dense CO gas and surrounding dust out of the southern BCG companion, meanwhile boosting its star formation. It is worth mentioning that we cannot firmly exclude the possibility that the tail is instead due to tidal interactions. However, since we only detected one extended tail, we tend to favor the ram-pressure scenario. Therefore, the southern BCG satellite is possibly the first high-z analog of local jellyfish galaxies (e.g., Jáchym et al. 2014, 2017, 2019; George et al. 2018; Vulcani et al. 2018; Poggianti et al. 2019) as well as of intermediate-z ones, such as those recently discovered in the clusters Abell 1758 (z = 0.27, Kalita & Ebeling 2019) and CGr32 (z = 0.73, Boselli et al. 2019).

We used the H2 masses of the northern and southern BCG companions, reported in Sect. 3.2, to estimate their stellar mass. Under the assumption that the H2-to-stellar mass ratio of the two sources reflects that of field galaxies, we can express the ratio as MH2/M⋆ ∼ 0.1 (1 + z)2 (Carilli & Walter 2013). This yields M⋆ ∼ 9.5 × 1010 M⊙ and M⋆ ∼ 1.4 × 1011 M⊙ for the northern and southern BCG satellites, respectively, that we detected separately in CO. Both molecular gas and stellar components of these BCG companions are, therefore, non-negligible and ∼0.2 and ∼0.3 of the total M⋆ = 4.5 × 1011 M⊙ of the BCG (Webb et al. 2015a), respectively.

By combining the MH2 upper limit for the BCG with its stellar mass estimate, we inferred a low molecular gas content MH2/M⋆ <  0.02. This is among the lowest gas-mass-to-stellar-mass ratios estimated for distant z >  1 ellipticals (e.g., Sargent et al. 2015; Gobat et al. 2018; Bezanson et al. 2019).

Our observations also imply an H2-to-dust mass ratio of MH2/Md≃455 and ≳973 for the southern and northern BCG companions, which are higher than the values of ∼100, typically found for distant star-forming galaxies (see Appendix A). Assuming a lower CO-to-H2 conversion factor than the Galactic one used in this work would alleviate the tension. However, for the northern companion, even in assuming an αCO = 0.8 M⊙ (K km s−1 pc2)−1, which is more typical of starbursts, we would still have a high MH2/Md ≳ 179. In order to explain the large MH2/Md ratio, it could be that a substantial fraction of the observed gas reservoir has been freshly accreted gas by these satellites.

The proximity of massive star-forming satellites, both in velocity, within ±150 km s−1, and in projection, within ∼20 kpc from the BCG, suggests that these sources are close to the interaction with the BCG itself. This scenario implies that the companions will merge into the BCG, which is consistent with previous studies of some distant BCGs (Tremblay et al. 2014; Bonaventura et al. 2017). The companions will thus either provide a significant gas supply, triggering the star formation in the BCG via gas rich (major) mergers, or they will rejuvenate the BCG stellar population with newly born stars.

The present study is thus one of the first works to observe rapid star formation, τdep = MH2/SFR ≃ 0.4 Gyr, at play in a very distant cluster core. The depletion timescale τdep was derived assuming the total MH2 = 3.3 × 1011 M⊙ reported in Sect. 3.2 and the infrared-based SFR = 860 M⊙ yr−1 inferred by Webb et al. (2015b) for the BCG system, which remains unresolved by Spitzer MIPS (Fig. 3). The presence of gas rich and massive star-forming companions of the BCG also shows that we are currently observing the build-up of the core of the distant SpARCS1049+56 cluster at the early z ∼ 2 epoch of cluster formation (e.g., Wang et al. 2016, for a similar case). Thus, it is likely that we are probing the cluster core in a transitioning phase of the cluster formation and possibly the reversal of the star formation versus density relation (Dressler 1980; Kauffmann et al. 2004). According to this scenario, we speculate that SpARCS1049+56 belongs to the transitioning population of clusters with starbursting cores, which has yet to be explored, thus constituting the link between z ≳ 2 proto-clusters that are still assembling (e.g., Hayashino et al. 2004; Umehata et al. 2019), extending over several megaparsecs, and virialized lower-z clusters, whose cores are typically populated by read-and-dead ellipticals and lenticular galaxies (Oemler 1974; Davis & Geller 1976). The synergy of ongoing and forthcoming observational radio (ALMA, SKA) and optical-infrared facilities (DES, LSST, Euclid, JWST) will provide large samples of well characterized starbursting cluster cores and BCGs at the epoch of cluster formation, such as SpARCS1049+56, thus revolutionizing the field of galaxy evolution in high-z dense environments.

Acknowledgments

We thank the anonymous referee for helpful comments which contributed to improve the paper. This work is based on observations carried out under project number S18CL with the IRAM NOEMA Interferometer. IRAM is supported by INSU/CNRS (France), MPG (Germany) and IGN (Spain). GC acknowledges financial support from both the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) and the Swiss Society for Astrophysics and Astronomy (SSAA). GC acknowledges the hospitality of the Observatory of Paris between Oct 28 and Nov 8, 2019 during which the present work has been finalized. GC thanks Emanuele Daddi for inspiring discussion.

References

  1. Alton, P. B., Xilouris, E. M., Misiriotis, A., et al. 2004, A&A, 425, 109 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  2. Andreon, S., & Congdon, P. 2014, A&A, 568, A2 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  3. Beelen, A., Cox, P., Benford, D. J., et al. 2006, ApJ, 642, 694 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Berta, S., Lutz, D., Genzel, R., et al. 2016, A&A, 587, A73 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bezanson, R., Spilker, J., Williams, C. C., et al. 2019, ApJ, 873, 19 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bonaventura, N. R., Webb, T. M. A., Muzzin, A., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 469, 1259 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Boselli, A., Epinat, B., Contini, T., et al. 2019, A&A, 631, A114 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  8. Brodwin, M., Gonzalez, A. H., Stanford, S. A., et al. 2012, ApJ, 753, 162 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Carilli, C. L., & Walter, F. 2013, ARA&A, 51, 105 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Castignani, G., Combes, F., Salomé, P., et al. 2019, A&A, 623, A48 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  11. Collins, C. A., Stott, J. P., Hilton, M., et al. 2009, Nature, 458, 603 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Coogan, R. T., Daddi, E., Sargent, M. T., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 479, 703 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  13. Davis, M., & Geller, M. J. 1976, ApJ, 208, 13 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. De Lucia, G., & Blaizot, J. 2007, MNRAS, 375, 2 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Dressler, A. 1980, ApJ, 236, 351 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Edge, A. C. 2001, MNRAS, 328, 762 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Emonts, B. H. C., Feain, I., Röttgering, H. J. A., et al. 2013, MNRAS, 430, 3465 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Emonts, B. H. C., Lehnert, M. D., Villar-Martín, M., et al. 2016, Science, 354, 1128 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Fabian, A. C., Sanders, J. S., Taylor, G. B., et al. 2006, MNRAS, 366, 417 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Finner, K., Jee, M. J., Webb, T., et al. 2020, ApJ, submitted [arXiv:2002.01956] [Google Scholar]
  21. Fogarty, K., Postman, M., Li, Y., et al. 2019, ApJ, 879, 103 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Fraser-McKelvie, A., Brown, M. J. I., & Pimbblet, K. A. 2014, MNRAS, 444, 63 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. George, K., Poggianti, B. M., Gullieuszik, M., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 479, 4126 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Gobat, R., Strazzullo, V., Daddi, E., et al. 2013, ApJ, 776, 9 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Gobat, R., Daddi, E., Magdis, G., et al. 2018, Nat. Astron., 2, 239 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Hamer, S. L., Edge, A. C., Swinbank, A. M., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 421, 3409 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Hayashino, T., Matsuda, Y., Tamura, H., et al. 2004, AJ, 128, 2073 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Jáchym, P., Combes, F., Cortese, L., et al. 2014, ApJ, 792, 11 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Jáchym, P., Sun, M., Kenney, J. D. P., et al. 2017, ApJ, 839, 114 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Jáchym, P., Kenney, J. D. P., Sun, M., et al. 2019, ApJ, 883, 145 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Kalita, B. S., & Ebeling, H. 2019, ApJ, 887, 158 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. Kauffmann, G., White, S. D. M., Heckman, T. M., et al. 2004, MNRAS, 353, 713 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Lauer, T. R., Postman, M., Strauss, M. A., et al. 2014, ApJ, 797, 82 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. Lidman, C., Suherli, J., Muzzin, A., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 427, 550 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. McDonald, M., Swinbank, M., Edge, A. C., et al. 2014, ApJ, 784, 18 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. McDonald, M., Stalder, B., Bayliss, M., et al. 2016, ApJ, 817, 86 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. McNamara, B. R., Russell, H. R., Nulsen, P. E. J., et al. 2014, ApJ, 785, 44 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. Newman, A. B., Ellis, R. S., Andreon, S., et al. 2014, ApJ, 788, 51 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. Oemler, Jr., A. 1974, ApJ, 194, 1O [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. Olivares, V., Salomé, P., Combes, F., et al. 2019, A&A, 631, A22 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  41. Papadopoulos, P. P., Röttgering, H. J. A., van der Werf, P. P., et al. 2000, ApJ, 528, 626 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. Planck Collaboration XXI. 2011a, A&A, 536, A21 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  43. Planck Collaboration XXV. 2011b, A&A, 536, A25 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  44. Planck Collaboration VI. 2018, A&A, submitted [arXiv:1807.06209] [Google Scholar]
  45. Poggianti, B. M., Ignesti, A., Gitti, M., et al. 2019, ApJ, 887, 155 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  46. Reynolds, C. S., & Fabian, A. C. 1996, MNRAS, 278, 479 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  47. Riess, A. G., Casertano, S., Yuan, W., et al. 2019, ApJ, 876, 85 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  48. Russell, H. R., McNamara, B. R., Edge, A. C., et al. 2014, ApJ, 784, 78 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  49. Russell, H. R., McNamara, B. R., Fabian, A. C., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 490, 3025 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  50. Salomé, P., & Combes, F. 2003, A&A, 412, 657 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  51. Salomé, P., Combes, F., Edge, A. C., et al. 2006, A&A, 454, 437 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  52. Sargent, M. T., Daddi, E., Bournaud, F., et al. 2015, ApJ, 806, L20 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  53. Scoville, N., Aussel, H., Sheth, K., et al. 2014, ApJ, 783 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  54. Scoville, N., Sheth, K., Aussel, H., et al. 2016, ApJ, 820, 83 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  55. Scoville, N., Lee, N., Vanden Bout, P., et al. 2017, ApJ, 837, 150 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  56. Solomon, P. M., & Vanden Bout, P. A. 2005, ARA&A, 43, 677 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  57. Stanford, S. A., Brodwin, M., Gonzalez, A. H., et al. 2012, ApJ, 753, 164 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  58. Stott, J. P., Collins, C. A., Burke, C., et al. 2011, MNRAS, 414, 445 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  59. Strazzullo, V., Coogan, R. T., Daddi, E., et al. 2018, ApJ, 862, 64 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  60. Tremblay, G. R., Gladders, M. D., Baum, S. A., et al. 2014, ApJ, 790, 26 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  61. Tremblay, G. R., Oonk, J. B. R., Combes, F., et al. 2016, Nature, 534, 218 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  62. Trudeau, A., Webb, T., Hlavacek-Larrondo, J., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 487, 1210 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  63. Umehata, H., Fumagalli, M., Smail, I., et al. 2019, Science, 366, 97 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  64. Vulcani, B., Poggianti, B. M., Gullieuszik, M., et al. 2018, ApJ, 866, 25 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  65. Wang, T., Elbaz, D., Daddi, E., et al. 2016, ApJ, 828, 56 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  66. Webb, T., Muzzin, A., Noble, A., et al. 2015a, ApJ, 814, 96 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  67. Webb, T., Noble, A., De Groot, A., et al. 2015b, ApJ, 809, 173 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  68. Webb, T., Lowenthal, J., Yun, M., et al. 2017, ApJ, 844, 17 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  69. Zhang, Y., Miller, C., McKay, T., et al. 2016, ApJ, 816, 98 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  70. Zirbel, E. L. 1996, ApJ, 473, 713 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Appendix A: Molecular gas and dust masses

In this appendix, we provide the formulas adopted in the text to estimate H2 molecular gas and dust masses, or their upper limits.

A.1. Molecular gas mass from CO(4→3)

In the presence of a CO(J→J-1) emission line, the velocity integrated flux SCO(J → J − 1)Δv is first converted into a velocity integrated luminosity , using Eq. (3) of Solomon & Vanden Bout (2005):

(A.1)

where νobs is the observer-frame frequency of the CO(J → J − 1) transition, J is a positive integer denoting the total angular momentum, and DL is the luminosity distance at the redshift z of the source. The total molecular gas mass can then be estimated as:

(A.2)

where is the excitation ratio. Typical values for J = 4 and J = 2 are r41 ≃ 0.46 and r21 ≃ 0.85, respectively, for submillimeter galaxies (Papadopoulos et al. 2000; Carilli & Walter 2013).

A.2. Continuum-based dust mass

We denote Sνobs as the observed continuum flux density of a given source at an observed frequency νobs. The frequency νobs is related to the rest-frame frequency νrf by the standard relation νobs = νrf/(1 + z). Similar to previous studies (e.g., Beelen et al. 2006), Sνobs can be expressed as a function of the dust mass Md and temperature Td, as follows:

(A.3)

where κd(ν) is the dust opacity per unit mass of dust and Bν(ν, T) is the spectral radiance of a black body of temperature T at frequency ν. It holds:

(A.4)

where h is the Planck constant, c is the speed of light, and kB is the Boltzmann constant. The dust opacity is modeled as:

(A.5)

with κ0 = 0.4 cm2 g−1 (Beelen et al. 2006; Alton et al. 2004, and references therein). We also chose the value β=1.8 (Scoville et al. 2017), which corresponds to the one that was determined for our Galaxy from Planck, (Planck Collaboration XXI 2011a; Planck Collaboration XXV 2011b). Then, Eq. (A.3) can be expressed in a more compact form as:

(A.6)

By inverting the last equation, the dust mass can be derived once the continuum flux density Sνobs is known.

A.3. Continuum-based molecular mass

Under some assumptions, continuum-based molecular mass can be estimated, similarly to Md. Following Scoville et al. (2014), we assume a direct proportionality between the continuum flux density Sνobs in the Rayleigh-Jeans regime and the interstellar medium (ISM) mass density, that is:

(A.7)

where ρd and ρISM are the dust and interstellar medium (ISM) mass densities, respectively, while κISM(ν) is the dust opacity per unit ISM mass. As found by Scoville et al. (2014) for distant star-forming galaxies out to z = 2, the continuum flux density Sνobs can then be expressed as:

(A.8)

The last estimate assumes that the total ISM mass is equal to 1.36 MH2 in order to account for the contribution of heavy elements (mostly He) to the ISM (Scoville et al. 2014, 2016). By inverting Eq. (A.8), the molecular gas mass can be estimated once the continuum flux density Sνobs is known. A comparison between Eq. (A.6) and Eq. (A.8) yields typical H2-to-dust mass ratios on the order of ∼100.

All Tables

Table 1.

CO(4→3) results for the northern and southern components and the system of the two, denoted as Total.

In the text

All Figures

thumbnail Fig. 1.

NOEMA CO(4→3) observations. a: intensity, b: velocity, and c: velocity dispersion maps derived from the moments 0, 1, and 2, respectively. Panel d: continuum map. Coordinates are reported as angular separations from the BCG. For each map, the velocity range that is considered corresponds to the velocity support of the CO(4→3) line. Solid contour levels are superimposed to both the intensity and continuum maps. They correspond to significance levels of 3, 10, and 15σ (panel a) as well as 3 and 4σ (panel d). The dashed ellipses at the bottom right corner of each panel show the beam size.
Open with DEXTER
In the text
thumbnail Fig. 2.

Baseline subtracted spectra of northern (top left) and southern (top right) sources, and the system of the two (bottom). In the panels, the solid line shows the Gaussian best fit to the CO(4→3) line. The vertical scale is in Jy.
Open with DEXTER
In the text
thumbnail Fig. 3.

HST (left; RGB image: the F105W filter is in blue and green, F160W in red), VLA 1.5 GHz (center), and VLA 10 GHz (right) images of the BCG and its surroundings taken from Trudeau et al. (2019). North is up, east is left. The CO(4→3) contours are overplotted in blue, as in Fig. 1a. Small shifts of 0.3 and 0.6 arcsec toward the east and north, respectively, are applied to the NOEMA contours, which is consistent with GCS catalog uncertainties in the absolute astrometry used by HST. In the central and right panels, the radio contours (3, 4, and 5σ levels) are in cyan and the Spitzer MIPS 24 μm contours are shown in beige.
Open with DEXTER
In the text

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.