Open Access
Table 2
Continuum flux comparison.
| Instrument | Beam (′′) |  (mJy) |
 (mJy) |
 (mJy) |
Ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| λ = 0.87 μm | |||||
| APEX | 19.2 | 12.6 ± 4.6 | 1 | ||
| SMA | 1.7 × 1.2 | 8.2 ± 2.4 | 2 | ||
| ALMA | 0.4 × 0.3 | 3.8 ± 0.4 | 3 | ||
| ALMA | 0.4 × 0.3 | 16.8 ± 1.7 | 5.8 ± 0.5 | 11.0 ± 1.2 | 4 |
| ALMA | 0.4 × 0.3 | 7.4 ± 1.4 | 3.0 ± 0.2 | 4.4 ± 1.3 | – |
| λ = 1.3 μm | |||||
| JCMT | 22.0 | 5.4 ± 1.0 | 5 | ||
| ALMA | 0.65 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 6 | |
| ALMA | 1.0 × 1.0 | 7.0 | 2.8 | 4.2 | 4 |
| NOEMA | 2.1 × 1.0 | 4.2 ± 1.2 | 1.7 ± 0.6 | 2.5 ± 0.7 | – |
| λ = 2.8 μm | |||||
| CARMA | 5.1 × 4.2 | 0.8 ± 0.3 | 2 | ||
| ALMA | 0.7 × 0.5 | 0.42 ± 0.05 | 7 | ||
| ALMA | 0.7 × 0.5 | 1.25 | 0.62 | 0.63 | 4 |
| ALMA | 0.8 × 0.6 | 0.7 ± 0.1 | 0.32 ± 0.02 | 0.39 ± 0.07 | – |
References. (1) Nilsson et al. (2010); (2) Flaherty et al. (2016); (3) White et al. (2016); (4) White & Boley (2018); (5) Sylvester et al. (2001); (6) Miley et al. (2018); (7) White et al. (2018); (–) this work: best-fit values from the two-component model.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.