Free Access

Table 2.

Best fitting models per object.

Supernova properties Best fitting model properties

Name Extinction Host Filters Reference Best match Explosion date Matches Unique
(AV) redshift (MJD) matches
Consistent with 56Ni distributions

PTF09dsy 0.35 0.013 R 9 EXP_Ni0.6_KE0.50_P9.7 55052.91(0.52) 36 14
SN 2009ig 0.09 0.009 BVRr 12 EXP_Ni0.8_KE1.10_P9.7 55061.20(0.54) 52 16
PTF10duz 0.07 0.064 R 9 EXP_Ni0.6_KE1.10_P4.4 55266.98(0.42) 755 48
PTF10hml 0.04 0.053 R 9 DPL_Ni0.6_KE1.68_P3 55334.42(0.66) 987 57
PTF10iyc 0.04 0.059 R 9 EXP_Ni0.8_KE1.68_P4.4 55343.35(0.32) 31 11
SN 2010jn 1.21 0.025 Rgr 13 EXP_Ni0.8_KE2.18_P4.4 55478.42(0.51) 770 38
PTF10accd 0.35 0.035 R 9 EXP_Ni0.6_KE1.10_P3 55537.10(0.32) 33 10
PTF11hub 0.03 0.029 R 9 DPL_Ni0.4_KE1.81_P9.7 55753.23(0.29) 17 5
SN 2011fe* 0.04 0.001 BVRgr 14, 15, 16 EXP_Ni0.6_KE0.78_P4.4 55796.79(0.57) 41 8
PTF12emp 0.03 0.037 R 9 EXP_Ni0.4_KE0.78_P4.4 56061.09(1.04) 108 30
SN 2012cg* 0.62 0.002 BVRr 17 EXP_Ni0.6_KE0.78_P4.4 56062.75(0.10) 12 3
PTF12gdq 0.10 0.033 R 9 EXP_Ni0.4_KE1.10_P9.7 56097.42(0.72) 247 22
KSN2012a 0.00 0.086 K2 8 DPL_Ni0.4_KE2.18_P3 56161.11(0.59) 23 3
SN 2012fr 0.06 0.005 BVgr LSQ 18, 19 EXP_Ni0.6_KE1.40_P9.7 56224.23(0.13) 30 3
LSQ12fxd 0.07 0.031 BVr LSQ 9, 10 DPL_Ni0.8_KE1.40_P4.4 56228.05(0.59) 147 20
SN 2012ht 0.08 0.004 BVRgr 20 EXP_Ni0.4_KE0.50_P9.7 56275.80(0.53) 56 14
LSQ13ry 0.12 0.030 BVgr LSQ 9, 10 EXP_Ni0.6_KE0.78_P9.7 56376.83(0.75) 152 20
iPTF13asv* 0.14 0.036 BVRr 3 EXP_Ni0.8_KE1.68_P9.7 56411.48(0.25) 93 6
SN 2013dy 1.07 0.004 BVR Unf. 21, 22 EXP_Ni0.4_KE0.50_P9.7 56479.55(0.84) 60 14
iPTF13dge* 0.34 0.016 BVgr 4 EXP_Ni0.4_KE1.40_P9.7 56536.30(0.78) 535 24
LSQ13cpk 0.06 0.033 LSQ 9 EXP_Ni0.6_KE1.68_P4.4 56572.34(0.54) 35 12
iPTF13ebh* 0.37 0.013 BVgr 5 EXP_Ni0.4_KE1.10_P9.7 56605.58(0.41) 70 10
SN 2013gy 0.48 0.014 BVgr 23 EXP_Ni0.6_KE1.10_P4.4 56630.48(0.23) 12 2
iPTF14bdn* 0.03 0.016 BVR 6 EXP_Ni0.6_KE1.40_P9.7 56801.17(0.47) 232 19
SN 2015F* 0.80 0.005 BVRgr 24, 25 EXP_Ni0.6_KE0.65_P9.7 57087.57(0.26) 29 5
iPTF16abc* 0.25 0.023 BVgr 7 EXP_Ni0.6_KE1.40_P4.4 57480.22(0.17) 17 2
SN 2017erp 0.60 0.006 BVRgr 29 EXP_Ni0.6_KE0.78_P4.4 57915.42(0.18) 12 3

Require additional early flux

LSQ12gpw 0.19 0.058 LSQ 9 EXP_Ni0.8_KE0.78_P4.4 56246.71(0.42) 583 33
LSQ12hzj 0.18 0.029 BVr LSQ 9, 10 EXP_Ni0.8_KE0.78_P100 56284.34(0.49) 131 6
SN 2016jhr 0.08 0.117 gr 11 EXP_Ni0.4_KE0.65_P3 57481.13(1.30) 3185 69
SN 2016coj 0.06 0.005 BVR Unf. 26, 27 DPL_Ni0.4_KE1.40_P100 57531.30(0.55) 232 19
SN 2017cbv 0.46 0.004 BVgr 28 EXP_Ni0.8_KE0.65_P4.4 57820.39(0.21) 16 6
SN 2018oh 0.11 0.011 Vg K2 2 EXP_Ni0.6_KE1.68_P4.4 58144.57(0.05) 2 1

Ambiguous

KSN2011b 0.00 0.052 K2 8 EXP_Ni0.4_KE2.18_P4.4 55828.58(0.05) 2 1
ASASSN-14lp 1.09 0.005 Vgr Unf. 1 DPL_Ni0.8_KE2.18_P9.7 56997.88(0.48) 19 4

Notes. Best fitting model parameters for each SN. Where appropriate, host galaxy extinction is included. The filters used to determine the best matching models are given. Explosion dates are given by the best matching model, while the uncertainty is calculated as the standard deviation of explosion dates from models within the 3σ range. Objects included in our gold sample are shown in bold. Within the group “consistent with 56Ni distributions”, those SNe denoted with an asterisk represent objects for which we believe additional tuning of our models is necessary to produce improved agreement.

References. (1) Shappee et al. (2016); (2) Shappee et al. (2019); (3) Cao et al. (2016); (4) Ferretti et al. (2016); (5) Hsiao et al. (2015); (6) Smitka et al. (2015); (7) Miller et al. (2018); (8) Olling et al. (2015); (9) Firth et al. (2015); (10) Walker et al. (2015); (11) Jiang et al. (2017); (12) Foley et al. (2012); (13) Hachinger et al. (2013); (14) Nugent et al. (2011); (15) Richmond & Smith (2012); (16) Vinkó et al. (2012); (17) Marion et al. (2016); (18) Zhang et al. (2014); (19) Contreras et al. (2018); (20) Yamanaka et al. (2014); (21) Zheng et al. (2013); (22) Pan et al. (2015); (23) Holmbo et al. (2019); (24) Cartier et al. (2017); (25) Im et al. (2015); (26) Richmond & Vietje (2017); (27) Zheng et al. (2017); (28) Hosseinzadeh et al. (2017); (29) Brown et al. (2019).

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.