Notes. Columns are from left to right as follows: (1) object names; (2) extinction values in the BLR are taken from Schnorr-Müller et al. (2016), and ^( • )extinction values in the BLR are estimated in this study using the same method provided by Schnorr-Müller et al. (2016); (3) FWHMs of Hα emission line; (4) FWHMs of Hβ (or Paβ) emission line; (5) black hole masses estimated from the following methods (for the different sections of the table) from top to bottom: (5A) Hα – FWHM (extinction-corrected), and (5B) megamaser disk, (5C) LLAMA M_BH–σ_⋆; (6) extinction-corrected black hole masses estimated from the Hβ–σ_Line (or Paβ – FWHM); (7) accretion rates; (8) Eddington ratios; and (9) offset from the M_BH–σ_⋆ relation of KH13 for given σ_⋆. The first section of the table lists LLAMA Seyfert (Sy) 1−1.5 AGNs, the second section lists the three LLAMA Seyfert 1.8 and 1.9 AGNs, the third section lists the two LLAMA Seyfert 2 galaxies for which megamaser observations are available, and the fourth section lists the rest LLAMA Seyfert 2 galaxies for which M_BH are estimated from the LLAMA M_BH–σ_⋆ relation. NGC 5128 also has black hole mass estimates from the other methods: M_BH 4.5 10⁷ M_⊙ from H₂ gas kinematics by Neumayer (2010), M_BH = 5.5 ± 3.010⁷ M_⊙ from stellar kinematics by Cappellari et al. (2009). We emphasize that our M_BH estimate for NGC 5128 is consistent with these results. The σ_CO(2-0) is used to obtain M_BH for NGC 5506 owing to the absence of σ_CaT. The M_BH estimates from ^( ⋆ )Braatz et al. (2015), ^( • )Greene et al. (2016). We note that we adopted 10% uncertainty for the M_BH of NGC 5728 owing to the absence of uncertainty in the related study. We adopted the A_V (BLR) estimates obtained from the He II line ratios for MCG-05-23-16, NGC 1365 and NGC 2992 reported by Schnorr-Müller et al. (2016), since this method gives better results for Sy 1.8 and Sy 1.9 galaxies.