Free Access

Table 2.

Stellar velocity dispersion comparison between the estimates from CaT and CO (2-0) absorption lines.

Object re σ⋆CaT σ⋆CO(2-0) Correction Sérsic index B/T Bulge type Seyfert activity
(arcsec) (km s−1) (km s−1) (%)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

ESO 137-G034 6.94 (a) 128 ± 4 130 ± 7 10 ( ⋆ ) 2.13 (a) 0.22 (a) PB? Sy 2 (II)
ESO 021-G004 16.7 (r) 178 ± 3 10 ( ⋆ ) Sy 2 (0)
MCG-05-14-12 4.41 (r) 73 ± 5 10 ( ⋆ ) Sy 1.0 (0 n)
MCG-05-23-16 9.37 (c) 135 ± 4 140 ± 7 11.8 3.20 (c) CB? Sy 1.9 (I)
MCG-06-30-15 0.63 (d) 95 ± 5 101 ± 6 10 ( ⋆ ) 1.29 (d) 0.06 (d) PB Sy 1.2 (0 n)
NGC 1365 12.8 (e) 121 ± 5 120 ± 6 20 0.86 (e) 0.25 (e) PB Sy 1.8 (I)
NGC 2110 6.80 (f) 227 ± 3 231 ± 5 10 ( ⋆ ) 2.70 (f) 0.39 (f) CB Sy 2 (II)
NGC 2992 14.2 (r) 154 ± 3 156 ± 5 12.2 Sy 1.8 (I)
NGC 3081 1.34 (g) 132 ± 4 135 ± 7 10 ( ⋆ ) 2.10 (g) 0.10 (g) PB? Sy 2(II)
NGC 3783 1.45 (a) 125 ± 5 134 ± 8 10 ( ⋆ ) 1.24 (a) 0.21 (a) PB Sy 1.2 (I)
NGC 4235 2.70 (o) 142 ± 5 10 ( ⋆ ) 6.00 (h) 0.50 (i) CB Sy 1.2 (I)
NGC 4388 5.62 (p) 117 ± 6 18.8 0.50 (j) Sy 2 (II)
NGC 4593 6.21 (b) 139 ± 5 145 ± 4 1.4 1.37 (b) 0.18 (b) PB Sy 1.2 (1)
NGC 5128 8.62 (k) 199 ± 8 10 ( ⋆ ) 2.63 (k) 1.00 (l) CB Sy 2 (III)
NGC 5506 2.06 (m) 118 ± 47 10 ( ⋆ ) 0.50 (m) 0.06 (m) PB Sy 1i (IV)
NGC 5728 4.02 (a) 168 ± 7 169 ± 9 2.8 1.10 (a) 0.23 (a) PB? Sy 2 (II)
NGC 6814 1.08 (a) 99 ± 4 110 ± 4 0 1.08 (a) 0.09 (a) PB Sy 1.2 (I)
NGC 7172 1.16 (a) 145 ± 5 146 ± 6 10 ( ⋆ ) 1.16 (a) 0.25 (a) PB? Sy 2 (II)
NGC 7213 13.7 (a) 209 ± 7 211 ± 10 0 2.57 (a) 0.70 (a) CB Sy 1.0 (V L)
NGC 7582 1.99 (a) 129 ± 4 130 ± 6 10 ( ⋆ ) 2.72 (a) 0.28 (a) PB? Sy 2 (II)

ESO 093-G003 11.5 (r) 87 ± 5 85 ± 8
ESO 208-G021 7.47 (g) 214 ± 6 213 ± 9 4.20 (g) 0.97 (g) CB
NGC 718 2.09 (a) 104 ± 5 118 ± 7 1.32 (a) 0.28 (a) PB
NGC 1079 4.94 (g) 114 ± 2 123 ± 7 2.20 (g) 0.25 (g) PB?
NGC 1315 16.1 (r) 77 ± 3
NGC 1947 30.1 (b) 147 ± 3 2.51 (b) 0.68 (b) CB
NGC 2775 63.2 (h) 175 ± 6 3.49 (h) 0.75 (i) CB
NGC 3175 40.1 (r) 73 ± 5 72 ± 7
NGC 3351 6.95 (a) 91 ± 4 91 ± 7 0.80 (a) 0.22 (a) PB
NGC 3717 32.5 (r) 137 ± 5
NGC 4224 5.01 (a) 146 ± 3 145 ± 8 2.53 (a) 0.29 (a) CB?
NGC 4254 12.59 (a) 82 ± 5 87 ± 7 1.99 (a) 0.19 (a) PB?
NGC 5037 23.2 (r) 168 ± 3
NGC 5845 0.49 (p) 262 ± 6 267 ± 10 1.0 (i) CB
NGC 5921 3.59 (n) 80 ± 2 1.60 (n) 0.50 (i) PB?
NGC 7727 5.07 (a) 201 ± 5 199 ± 7 1.68 (a) 0.36 (a) CB?
IC 4653 17.0 (r) 64 ± 5

Notes. Sector 1 (top): LLAMA AGNs; Sector 2 (bottom): the LLAMA inactive Galaxies. Columns are from left to right as follows: (1) object name; (2) bulge effective radius; (3) stellar velocity dispersion estimates from the CaT absorption lines; (4) stellar velocity dispersion estimates from the CO (2-0) transmission; (5) rotation contribution in percentage; ( ⋆ )the assumed rotation contribution, which is the average rotation contribution of LLAMA sample; (6) Sérsic index; (7) bulge-to-total mass ratio (B/T); and (8) bulge type, where PB and CB refer to pseudo-bulge and classical-bulge, respectively. The CaT region of NGC 5506 is highly contaminated by AGN emission lines, therefore the σCaT is not presented in our study. There is no available X-shooter observation for NGC 4388, but there are three available σ⋆CaT estimates from the literature. The reported σ⋆CaT values differ significantly: σ⋆CaT = 119 km s−1 (Terlevich et al. 1990), σ⋆CaT = 165 ± 21 km s−1 (Riffel et al. 2015), and σ⋆CaT = 76 km s−1 (Greene et al. 2010). But the central velocity dispersion measurements of this galaxy, as reported by Greene et al. (2010), Saglia et al. (2016), van den Bosch (2016), are in the range ∼100−120 km s−1, which are consistent with our σCO(2-0) estimate. Therefore, we used our σCO(2-0) estimate as a surrogate for σ⋆CaT for NGC 4388.

References. Reference for Seyfert activity in the literature; (0): this work, (I): Schnorr-Müller et al. (2016), (II): Gu et al. (2006), (III): Maiolino & Rieke (2013) (IV): Véron & Véron (2010), (V): González-Martín et al. (2015). We note that L is LINER and n indicates narrow-line Seyfert 1 galaxies according to our spectral investigations. Bulge properties are taken from as follows: (a) Lin et al. (2018), (b) Gao et al. (2019), (c) Capetti (2007), (d) Hu et al. (2016), (e) Combes et al. (2019), (f) Gadotti (2008), (g) Laurikainen et al. (2010), (h) Salo et al. (2015), (i) de Lapparent et al. (2011), (j) Greene et al. (2010), (k) Fisher & Drory (2010), (l) Kormendy et al. (2015), (m) Yoshino & Yamauchi (2015), (n) Knapen et al. (2003), (o) Baggett et al. (1998), (p) van den Bosch (2016), (r) Skrutskie et al. (2006).

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.