Free Access
Erratum
This article is an erratum for: [this article]

Issue
A&A
Volume 633, January 2020
Article Number C1
Number of page(s) 1
Section Letters to the Editor
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201833633e
Published online 15 January 2020

Due to a mistake in the treatment of the local standard of rest velocity, we deduced a wrong velocity for one of the features of one of the lines mentioned in Sect. 3.1. We wrote that the 29SiO v = 0 line shows an absorption feature in the range between –29 km s−1 and –33 km s−1. But, in fact, it appears between –8 km s−1 and –14 km s−1. This error in the velocity does not affect our conclusions at all, and it is barely relevant in that work; but the actual velocity can be interesting and, indeed, the structure of this and other profiles will be widely discussed in a forthcoming paper.


© ESO 2020

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.