Table 2.
Targets with the best attenuation laws used to fit the full SED.
ID | CLS ID | Redshift | Best law | ![]() |
Other laws |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
GS01* | 3280 | 2.191 | C00 | 21.0 | LF17 |
GS02 | 5339 | 2.326 | CF00 | 49.0 | LF17 |
GS03* | 2619 | 2.241 | LF17 | 15.7 | CF00 |
GS04 | 7184 | 1.956 | CF00 | 37.2 | LF17 |
GS05* | 9834 | 2.576 | LF17 | 43.3 | |
GS06* | 14876 | 2.309 | LF17 | 54.1 | |
GS07* | 8409 | 1.619 | CF00 | 52.9 | |
UDF1* | 15669 | 2.698* | C00 | 46.2 | |
UDF2 | 15639 | 2.696* | C00 | 45.9 | |
UDF3* | 15876 | 2.543 | LF17 | 98.9 | |
UDF4 | 15844 | 2.43 | C00 | 42.7 | |
UDF5 | 13508 | 1.759 | CF00 | 41.7 | LF17/C00 |
UDF7* | 15381 | 2.59 | C00 | 25.9 | |
UDF10 | 12743 | 2.086** | CF00 | 18.3 | LF17 |
UDF11* | 12624 | 1.996 | CF00 | 34.2 | LF17/C00 |
UDF13* | 15432 | 2.497 | C00 | 20.4 | LF17 |
UDF15 | 15015 | 1.721** | C00 | 29.0 | LF17 |
Notes. Column 1: target name, sources with an X-ray detection are indicated with a star. Column 2: CANDELS identifier from Guo et al. (2013). Column 3: redshifts from Elbaz et al. (2018) except for sources with one or two stars after the redshift value (from Rujopakarn et al. 2019 and Dunlop et al. 2017 respectively). Columns 4 and 5: best attenuation law (Col. 4) from the best χ2 (Col. 5). Column 6: other attenuation law(s) corresponding to ΔBIC lower than 6 as compared to the best case (ordered by increasing ΔBIC).
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.