Table 3.
Summary of the MFP vs. redshift.
| Redshift bin | MFPW14 | MFP |
MFP |
MFP |
MFP |
 |
 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pMpc | pMpc | pMpc | pMpc | pMpc | |||
| 3.60−3.80 | 51.68 | 53.26 | 50.56 | 55.63 | 59.39 | 0.978 | 1.149 |
| 3.80−4.00 | 41.27 | 46.08 | 47.74 | 49.17 | 56.64 | 1.157 | 1.373 |
| 4.00−4.20 | 33.25 | 38.20 | 39.09 | 41.43 | 46.44 | 1.176 | 1.397 |
| 4.20−4.40 | 27.01 | 32.83 | 34.36 | 38.95 | 44.96 | 1.272 | 1.665 |
| 4.40−4.60 | 22.11 | 25.06 | 26.97 | 30.83 | 36.37 | 1.220 | 1.645 |
Notes. The first column lists the redshift bins. MFPW14 indicates the MFP from the best-fit formula by Worseck et al. (2014). MFP
and MFP
are the values obtained by the stacking technique and the mean of the distribution functions, respectively, for the whole sample (option 1). MFP
and MFP
are the same quantities excluding QSOs with IFP ≤ 10 pMpc (option 2). The last two columns list the ratio between the MFP values obtained by the distribution functions for options 1 and 2, respectively, and MFPW14.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.