The supernova remnant population of the Small Magellanic Cloud

Pierre Maggi; Miroslav D. Filipović; Branislav Vukotić; Jean Ballet; Frank Haberl; Chandreyee Maitra; Patrick Kavanagh; Manami Sasaki; Milorad Stupar

doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936583

Home

All issues

Volume 631 (November 2019)

A&A, 631 (2019) A127

Full HTML

Open Access

Table 2

Emission line intensities and ratios for two SNR candidates observed with the WiFeS spectrograph, taking Hα = 100.

Date	Object name	Slit position (J2000)		[N II]	Hα	[N II]	[S II]	[S II]	[N II]/Hα	[S II]/Hα	[S II]	Electron density

	MCSNR	RA	Dec	6548 Å		6583 Å	6717 Å	6731 Å			6717/6731 Å	(cm⁻³)
08/11/2015	J0056–7209	00 55 59	–72 10 04	26.7	100^(a)	14.8	27	20.4	0.42	0.47	1.32	~10²

08/11/2015	J0109–7318	01 09 47	–73 19 27	29.5	100^(b)	9.1	28.1	18	0.39	0.46	1.56	LDL

Notes. The rms wavelength dispersion error from the arc calibrations was 0.09 Å while the relative percentage error in the flux determination from the calibration using the brightest lines was estimated as ~13%. ^(a) Hα flux = 19 154 counts; ^(b) Hα flux = 8837 counts.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.