Open Access
Table 6
Literature comparison of the density power-law index p.
Reference | Source(s) | p | Method | Spatial scale (a) |
---|---|---|---|---|
van der Tak et al. (2000) | 12 massive young stars | 1.0 − 1.5 | CS line and continuum modeling | Clump |
2 hot core types | 2.0 | CS line and continuum modeling | Clump | |
Choi et al. (2000) | Mon R2 dense core | 0.9 | CS line Large Velocity Gradient simulations | Clump |
Mon R2 dense core | 0.8 | CS line radiative transfer simulations | Clump | |
Beuther et al. (2002) | 69 massive star-forming regions | 1.6 ± 0.5 | Continuum radial intensity profile modeling | Clump |
Mueller et al. (2002) | 31 dense cores | 1.8 ± 0.4 | Continuum SED and radial intensity profile modeling | Clump |
Hatchell & van der Tak (2003) | 10 UC H II regions | 1.25 − 2.25 | Continuum SED and radial intensity profile modeling + CS line modeling | Clump |
Chen et al. (2006) | W3(H2O) hot core | 1.52 | Continuum radiative transfer model | Core |
Beuther et al. (2007c) | 3 cores in IRAS05358+3543 | 1.5 − 2 | Continuum uv-plane analysis | Core |
Zhang et al. (2009) | 2 high-mass cores in G28.34+0.06 | 1.6 − 2.1 | Continuum uv-plane analysis | Core |
Longmore et al. (2011) | massive protocluster G8.68−0.37 | 1.8 ± 0.2 | Continuum uv-plane analysis | Core |
Palau et al. (2014) | 19 massive dense cores | 1.5 − 2.4 | Continuum SED and radial intensity profile model | Clump + core |
Beltrán et al. (2018) | G31.41+0.31 hot core | 2.2 | Radial H2 column density profile fit | Core |
This work | AFGL2591 hot core | 1.7 ± 0.1 | Continuum uv-plane analysis | Core |
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.