Open Access

Table 6

Literature comparison of the density power-law index p.

Reference Source(s) p Method Spatial scale (a)
van der Tak et al. (2000) 12 massive young stars 1.0 − 1.5 CS line and continuum modeling Clump
2 hot core types 2.0 CS line and continuum modeling Clump
Choi et al. (2000) Mon R2 dense core 0.9 CS line Large Velocity Gradient simulations Clump
Mon R2 dense core 0.8 CS line radiative transfer simulations Clump
Beuther et al. (2002) 69 massive star-forming regions 1.6 ± 0.5 Continuum radial intensity profile modeling Clump
Mueller et al. (2002) 31 dense cores 1.8 ± 0.4 Continuum SED and radial intensity profile modeling Clump
Hatchell & van der Tak (2003) 10 UC H II regions 1.25 − 2.25 Continuum SED and radial intensity profile modeling + CS line modeling Clump
Chen et al. (2006) W3(H2O) hot core 1.52 Continuum radiative transfer model Core
Beuther et al. (2007c) 3 cores in IRAS05358+3543 1.5 − 2 Continuum uv-plane analysis Core
Zhang et al. (2009) 2 high-mass cores in G28.34+0.06 1.6 − 2.1 Continuum uv-plane analysis Core
Longmore et al. (2011) massive protocluster G8.68−0.37 1.8 ± 0.2 Continuum uv-plane analysis Core
Palau et al. (2014) 19 massive dense cores 1.5 − 2.4 Continuum SED and radial intensity profile model Clump + core
Beltrán et al. (2018) G31.41+0.31 hot core 2.2 Radial H2 column density profile fit Core
This work AFGL2591 hot core 1.7 ± 0.1 Continuum uv-plane analysis Core

Notes. (a) Based on the angular resolution of the observations (>10″ for “clump” and <10″ for “core” scales).

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.