Table 3.
Best-fit and marginalized parameter values for the lens light component of the mass model obtained by reconstructing the source SB.
| Chameleon 1 (lens) | Chameleon 2 (lens) | Chameleon 3 (lens) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parameter | Best-fit value | Marginalized value | Best-fit value | Marginalized | Best-fit value | Marginalized |
| x [″] | 11.00 | − | 11.00 | − | 11.00 | − |
| y [″] | 9.67 | − | 9.67 | − | 9.67 | − |
| qL | 0.62 |  |
1.00 |  |
1.00 |  |
| θ [rad] | 1.52 | − | 1.52 | − | 1.52 | − |
| L0 (F160W) | 46.67 | − | 3.50 | − | 8.56 | − |
| wc | 0.08 |  |
1.95 |  |
0.18 |  |
| wt | 0.18 |  |
6.99 |  |
1.24 |  |
| L0 (F475W) | 0.11 |  |
0.027 |  |
0.010 |  |
Notes. This model includes three chameleon profiles (see Eq. (14)) for the F160W filter and additionally the same profiles with the same structural parameters for the F475W band. We fix the amplitudes of the F160W band since we are multiplying these values with the M/L (variable parameter) in constructing the baryonic mass component.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.