Table 4.
Comparison between PSR J0726–2612 and the XDINSs.
| Source | P | Ṗ | Bp | Ecyc | Bcyc | LX/Ė | Pulse | PF | Refs. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RX | s | 10−14 s s−1 | 1013 G | eV | 1013 G | % | |||
| J0420.0−5022 | 3.45 | 2.76 | 2.0 | ... | ... | 0.31−0.38 | Single | 13 | (1) |
| J0720.4−3125 | 16.78 | 18.6 | 11.3 |  |
 |
99−157 | Double | 11 | (2) |
| J0806.4−4123 | 11.37 | 5.6 | 5.1 |  |
 |
10.6−16.7 | Single | 6 | (1) |
| J1308.6+2127 (RBS 1223) | 10.31 | 11.2 | 6.9 |  |
 |
31.5−39.6 | Double | 18 | (3) |
| J1605.3+3249 (RBS 1556) | ... | ... | ... |  |
 |
... | ... | <1.4 | (4) |
| J1856.5−3754 | 7.06 | 2.98 | 2.9 | ... | ... | 9.6−15.2 | Single | 1.2 | (5) |
| J2143.0+0654 (RBS 1774) | 9.43 | 4.1 | 4.0 |  |
 |
33.2−41.8 | Single | 4 | (6–7) |
| PSR J0726–2612 | 3.44 | 29.3 | 6.4 |  |
 |
1.1−3.0 | Double | 30 | (8) |
Notes. Bp and Bcyc are the magnetic field at the poles evaluated from the timing parameter and from the cyclotron energy, respectively. Ecyc values are taken from Yoneyama et al. (2019), while LX values from Viganò et al. (2013).
References. (1) Haberl et al. (2004); (2) Hambaryan et al. (2017); (3) Hambaryan et al. (2011); (4) Pires et al. (2019); (5) Tiengo & Mereghetti (2007); (6) Zane et al. (2005); (7) Mignani et al. (2011); (8) this paper.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.