Table 1.
Parameters and characteristics of the sample of THINGS galaxies considered in the analysis.
| Name | i (RDM) | 
|
(i,j,ι,γ) | 
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | (8) | (9) |
| DDO 154* | 64° | 20% | (20°,30°,0.3,1) | 24% | 13 | 13 | 8 | 13% |
| NGC 628 | 20° | 54% | (40°,20°,0.9,1) | 67% | 34 | 30 | 17 | 27% |
| NGC 925* | 64° | 25% | (30°,10°,0.3,1) | 25% | 35 | 30 | 24 | 21% |
| NGC 2366* | 54° | 37% | (20°,10°,0.9,2) | 48% | 25 | 23 | 17 | 24% |
| NGC 2403* | 64° | 10% | (20°,20°,0.3,1) | 14% | 12 | 22 | 11 | 7% |
| NGC 2841* | 70° | 18% | (30°,20°,0.6,4) | 20% | 55 | 65 | 30 | 8% |
| NGC 2903* | 63° | 12% | (30°,20°,0.3,1) | 13% | 33. | 43 | 21 | 9% |
| NGC 2976* | 41° | 37% | (40°,10°,0.3,2) | 37% | 24 | 26 | 24 | 30% |
| NGC 3031* | 47° | 30% | (50°,10°,0.6,2) | 30% | 73 | 82 | 72 | 23% |
| NGC 3077 | 20° | 38% | (30°,10°,0.3,1) | 48% | 30 | 42 | 24 | 26% |
| NGC 3184 | 23° | 22% | (50°,10°,0.6,1) | 25% | 17 | 20 | 12 | 13% |
| NGC 3198* | 70° | 22% | (20°,30°,0.3,2) | 17% | 26 | 36 | 22 | 12% |
| NGC 3351 | 39° | 13% | (40°,10°,0.3,2) | 14% | 25 | 24 | 10 | 6% |
| NGC 3521* | 68° | 15% | (40°,10°,0.3,2) | 18% | 44 | 55 | 34 | 12% |
| NGC 3621* | 66° | 26% | (20°,30°,0.3,1) | 26% | 51 | 47 | 20 | 12% |
| NGC 3627* | 53° | 67% | (20°,10°,0.6,2) | 88% | 123 | 113 | 45 | 24% |
| NGC 4214 | 20° | 61% | (10°,20°,0.9,1) | 63% | 27 | 19 | 13 | 27% |
| NGC 4449 | 65° | 48% | (30°,10°,0.3,1) | 47% | 47 | 43 | 21 | 21% |
| NGC 4736* | 37° | 19% | (30°,20°,0.9,1) | 26% | 27 | 34 | 15 | 13% |
| NGC 4826* | 58° | 18% | (20°,20°,0.3,1) | 19% | 31 | 38 | 30 | 18% |
| NGC 5055* | 52° | 29% | (30°,20°,0.3,1) | 22% | 60 | 44 | 15 | 6% |
| NGC 5194* | 20° | 92% | (60°,40°,0.3,1) | 100% | 160 | 100 | 58 | 50% |
| NGC 5236* | 51° | 33% | (40°,10°,0.3,1) | 40% | 50 | 60 | 23 | 16% |
| NGC 5457* | 41° | 44% | (60°,10°,0.3,4) | 43% | 43 | 52 | 25 | 22% |
| NGC 6946* | 32° | 22% | (60°,10°,0.9,2) | 27% | 26 | 39 | 20 | 17% |
| NGC 7331* | 70° | 20% | (30°,10°,0.6,2) | 19% | 76 | 74 | 50 | 18% |
| NGC 7793* | 20° | 26% | (30°,10°,0.9,1) | 24% | 26 | 21 | 10 | 10% |
| IC 2574 | 49° | 18% | (60°,10°,0.6,2) | 18% | 11 | 19 | 10 | 10% |
Notes. The table lists: (1) name (the asterisk marks the galaxies present in the de Blok et al. 2008 sample) ; (2) the best fit inclination angle obtained by the RDM minimization; (3) the amplitude of the residual fields obtained by the RDM minimization; (4) the best-fit parameters obtained by the REM minimization; (5) the amplitude of the residual fields obtained by the REM minimization; (6) value (in km s−1) of the 95% of the distribution of the residual velocities (in absolute value) for the RDM case (
); (7) as in (6) but for the REM case (
) (8) as in (6) but for the RTRM (9) the amplitude of the residual fields obtained by the RTRM minimization.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.