EDP Sciences
Free Access
Erratum
This article is an erratum for: [this article]

Issue
A&A
Volume 622, February 2019
Article Number C1
Number of page(s) 1
Section Catalogs and data
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201833500e
Published online 15 February 2019

References to the figures in the text are not correct. The corrected figure references along with the respective texts of the original paper are as follows:

– Caption of Fig. 5: References to right and left panels are inverted. The corrected figure caption is:

Left panel: comparison of Teff versus spectral type relation as a function of metallicity from this study with Passegger et al. (2018; open triangle) and with Rajpurohit et al. (2013; open circle). Right panel: comparison of Teff determined from this study with Passegger et al. (2018; open triangle) and with Gaidos & Mann (2014; filled square) as function of metallicity.

– Corrected text (page 5, right column): In order to explore the effect of stellar properties of M dwarfs, we have compared our results with the behavior of Teff, as a function of spectral type with Rajpurohit et al. (2013) as shown in Fig. 5 (left panel).

– Corrected text (page 5, right column): In order to explore further, we compared T eff determination with Gaidos & Mann (2014; hereafter G14) along with Passegger et al. (2018), for the common stars in our sample as shown in Fig 5 (right panel).

– Corrected text (page 6, left column): Passegger et al. (2018) compare the observed spectra with the synthetic spectra computed using the PHOENIX-ACES models, which are based on the PHOENIX version by Husser et al. (2013), and the equation of state by Barman et al. (2001), as shown in Fig 5 (right panel).

– Corrected text (page 6, right column): Figure 6 (left panel) shows the comparison of log g with Passegger et al. (2018) indicating difference of around 0.2 to 0.6 dex with our values.

– Corrected text (page 7, left column): Figure 6 (right panel) shows the comparison of the [M/H] derived in this study with Passegger et al. (2018) and G14, indicating difference of around 0.2 to 0.4 dex with our values.

References


© ESO 2019

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.