Free Access

Table 2

Parameters of the sources detected with the SMA at 1.3 mm dust continuum emission.

Positiona Deconv. ang. sizea PAa a Sνb Massc

Source α(J2000) δ(J2000) (°) (mJy beam−1) (mJy) (M) Associationd
SMA1 00:36:47.366 63:29:02.237 1.6 ± 0.3 × 0.9 ± 0.2 8 ± 15 13.84 ± 1.72 41.4 ± 8.3 0.69 CM:VLA 3/IR:IRAS
SMA3a 00:36:46.860 63:28:59.414 1.2 ± 0.2 × 0.6 ± 0.1 − 44 ± 8 4.71 ± 0.28 9.2 ± 1.9 0.15
SMA3b 00:36:46.562 63:28:58.040 0.9 ± 0.3 × 0.6 ± 0.2 − 69 ± 31 6.45 ± 0.66 11.1 ± 2.3 0.19 IR:RNO1C
SMA3c 00:36:46.761 63:28:57.583 1.9 ± 0.4 × 0.6 ± 0.1 − 9 ± 6 8.72 ± 0.85 24.7 ± 5.0 0.41 CM:VLA 1
SMA3d 00:36:46.387 63:28:57.326 Point source 5.93 ± 0.24 11.0 ± 2.2 0.18
SMA3e 00:36:46.198 63:28:56.829 0.6 ± 0.1 × 0.5 ± 0.1 − 77 ± 29 6.24 ± 0.35 8.6 ± 1.8 0.14
SMA3f 00:36:46.348 63:28:55.930 1.0 ± 0.3 × 0.6 ± 0.1 − 25 ± 11 4.74 ± 0.10 8.6 ± 1.8 0.14
SMA3g 00:36:46.450 63:28:54.966 1.5 ± 0.3 × 0.4 ± 0.2 − 70 ± 10 5.72 ± 0.36 13.0 ± 2.7 0.22
SMA3h 00:36:46.330 63:28:54.583 Point source 5.41 ± 0.39 7.3 ± 1.5 0.12
SMA3i 00:36:46.606 63:28:54.248 2.0 ± 0.6 × 0.6 ± 0.2 − 13 ± 8 6.22 ± 0.58 18.4 ± 3.8 0.31
SMA5a 00:36:46.000 63:28:52.704 1.1 ± 0.3 × 0.5 ± 0.2 − 64 ± 17 4.50 ± 0.42 8.3 ± 1.7 0.14 IR:RNO1B
SMA5b 00:36:46.255 63:28:52.307 0.9 ± 0.2 × 0.1 ± 0.1 − 16 ± 8 5.63 ± 0.46 7.6 ± 1.6 0.13
SMA6a 00:36:46.584 63:28:49.613 1.5 ± 0.3 × 0.9 ± 0.2 − 82 ± 22 8.50 ± 0.11 25.7 ± 5.2 0.43
SMA6b 00:36:46.936 63:28:47.078 0.7 ± 0.1 × 0.2 ± 0.1 − 28 ± 8 4.96 ± 0.24 6.5 ± 1.3 0.11

Notes. (a) Position, deconvolvedsize, position angle (PA), peak intensity, flux density and the respective uncertainties derived from fitting a 2D Gaussian to each source using IMFIT task from MIRIAD. (b) Error in flux density has been calculated as (Beltrán et al. 2001; Palau et al. 2013), where σ is the rms of the map, θsource and θbeam are the size of the source and the beam, respectively, and σflux-scale is the error in the flux scale, which takes into account the uncertainty on the calibration applied to the flux density of the source (Sν × %uncertainty) which we assumed to be 20%. (c)Masses derived assuming a dust temperature of 22 K, and a dust (+gas) mass opacity coefficient at 1.3 mm of 0.9 cm2 g−1 (for thin ice mantles after 105 yr of coagulation at a gas density of 106 cm−3, Ossenkopf & Henning 1994). The uncertainty in the masses due to the opacity law and temperature is estimated to be a factor of 4. (d) Association with signposts of stellar activity: IR = infrared source; CM = Centimeter radio source. IRAS refers to IRAS 0038 + 6312.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.