Table 5.
SFR of Leo P based on the observed Hα flux.
SFR–Hα relation | log10(SFR/(M⊙ yr−1)) |
---|---|
Kennicutt (1998) | –4.4 |
Lee et al. (2009) | –3.2 |
CAN IMF, [Fe/H] = 0 | –4.6 |
CAN IMF, [Fe/H] = –2 | –4.9 |
IGIMF1, [Fe/H] = 0 | –2.8 |
IGIMF1, [Fe/H] = –2 | –3.0 |
IGIMF3, [Fe/H] = 0 | –2.8 |
IGIMF3, [Fe/H] = –2 | –3.2 |
Notes. We note the more than one order of magnitude difference in the calculated SFR between the IGIMF models and the invariant IMF models. The Lee et al. (2009) value is derived assuming their purely empirical correction to the Kenniutt relation (reached without an underlying model for an IMF variation), which is consistent with the IGIMF models in the regime −4 < log10(LHα/(1041 erg s−1)) < 0. To form a single massive star with a main-sequence mass of 25 M⊙ over 105 yr (Wuchterl & Tscharnuter 2003; Duarte-Cabral et al. 2013), a SFR = 25/105 M⊙ yr−1 = 10−3.60 M⊙ yr−1 is needed over this time, but a dwarf galaxy would be forming other stars as well, such that the SFRs calculated using the IGIMF theory are consistent with the existence of such a star in Leo P.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.