Free Access
Table A.1
Value of the dispersion on a single-resolution element in the wings of the CCF of all considered bands for observations of a single transit.
Band name | Instrument simulated | Precision (1 transit) | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
![]() |
HARPS(-N) | 51 ppm | Allart et al. (2017) reported 34 ppm with three transits, |
equivalent to 58 ppm with one transit, | |||
with a mask similar to that adopted in this paper | |||
![]() |
ESPRESSO | 20 ppm | |
![]() |
GIANO | – | Accuracy limited by telluric contamination |
![]() |
GIANO | – | Accuracy limited by telluric contamination |
![]() |
GIANO | – | Accuracy limited by telluric contamination |
Y band | GIANO | 33 ppm | |
J band | GIANO | 31 ppm | |
H band | GIANO | 27 ppm |
Notes. The GIANO resolution element is larger, which is why the precision is higher. However, this results in a more poorly sampled CCF (see Fig. 3).
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.