Free Access

Table 5

Estimated signal as a percentage of the stellar flux, for both light curve (LC) and division (Div.) approaches, compared to the measurments by Zhou & Bayliss (2012), Wood et al. (2011), Sing et al. (2016) and Sedaghati et al. (2016).

Passband (Å) 0.75 1 1.5 3 5 50
This work (LC) 0.74 ± 0.54 0.55 ± 0.43 0.40 ± 0.29 0.19 ± 0.15
This work (Div.) 0.46 ± 0.29 0.34 ± 0.20 0.22 ± 0.12 0.12 ± 0.06
Zhou & Bayliss 0.58 ± 0.13
Wood et al. 1.46 ± 0.017 0.55 ± 0.13 0.49 ± 0.09
Sing et al. 0.33 ± 0.18
Sedaghati et al. 0.10 ± 0.09
1/x 0.74 ± 0.54 0.55 ± 0.41 0.37 ± 0.026 0.18 ± 0.13 0.11 ± 0.08 0.01 ± 0.01

Notes. The last row roughly shows the expected absorption signal, considering the relation of for the absorption as a function of passband and using our measurement at 0.75 Å (LC) as the narrowest absorption band.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.