Free Access

Table 3.

Best fit parameters for the comparison between Bayesian stellar parameters from evolutionary tracks to stellar parameters from the literature.

Sample NStars Quantity Value m* c*
Lick ⋂ Charm2 86 Rtrk./RCh. 0.98±0.10
Lick ⋂ Charm2 86 Rtrk.RCh. −0.69±10.10 R R
Lick ⋂ Hekker & Meléndez (2007) 364 Teff, trk.Teff, spec. −41±106 K K
Lick ⋂ Hekker & Meléndez (2007) 364 〈log(g)trk. − log(g)spec. −0.36±0.26 dex dex
Lick ⋂ Reffert et al. (2015) 361 Mtrk.Mp. −0.12±0.47 M M
Lick ⋂ Reffert et al. (2015)a 202 Mtrk.Mp. 0.00±0.48 M M
Lick ⋂ Reffert et al. (2015)b159 Mtrk.Mp. −0.27±0.42 M
Test Samplec 24 Mtrk.MAst. 0.01 ± 0.20 M M M
Test Sampled 24 Mtrk.MAst. 0.01 ± 0.20 M M

Notes.

(*)

Coefficient of linear model y = mx + c;

(a)

stars that have been assigned the same evolutionary stage;

(b)

stars that have a different assigned evolutionary stage;

(c)

fit with x and y errors;

(d)

fit with y error only.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.