Table 1.
Control field results.
| Method | AK = 0 mag | AK = 1 mag | AK = 2 mag |
|---|---|---|---|
| XNICER | 0.00 ± 0.14 [0.14] | −0.01 ± 0.12 [0.11] | −0.03 ± 0.11 [0.10] |
| NICER | +0.07 ± 0.22 [0.20] | −0.03 ± 0.15 [0.17] | −0.11 ± 0.19 [0.16] |
| PNICER-c | 0.00 ± 0.18 [0.19] | −0.04 ± 0.13 [0.16] | −0.08 ± 0.14 [0.16] |
| PNICER-m | 0.00 ± 0.15 [0.26] | −0.01 ± 0.26 [0.16] | −0.01 ± 0.57 [0.01] |
Notes. Each table cell shows the combination b ± e, that is, the bias and the average error associated with a single extinction measurement computed using Eq. (37) for different true extinction values (columns) and different methods (rows). These values are followed by the expected noise ē, evaluated using Eq. (38). Ideally, b should be as close to zero as possible (negligible bias), e should be as small as possible (small noise), and ē should be as close as possible to e (accurate noise estimate). All quantities are expressed in magnitudes.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.