Free Access

Table 1

Nova candidate events, identified using the SPI-ACS rate and the nova model light curve by Hernanz (2014).

tT0 T1 T2 Δ T a0 χ2ν HR500 [σ] Comments
–455.2 83.713 83.715 181.3 >0.2 234.6 >1000 –0.0 GRB
–450.2 83.914 83.922 690.8 0.092(7) 8.0 13.1 +0.0 not nova-like
–429.8 84.762 84.770 690.8 0.065(7) 3.2 9.3 –0.4 too early
–352.5 87.993 87.994 25.7 0.049(8) 22.3 6.1 +2.2 GRB
–329.7 88.943 88.950 604.5 0.050(7) 3.3 7.1 +2.9 Sun/GOES
–322.0 89.205 89.223 1555.0 0.030(8) 1.2 3.9 +2.7 Sun/GOES
–321.7 89.278 89.285 605.1 0.065(7) 8.2 9.3 –0.8 not nova-like
–281.2 90.959 90.960 69.2 0.183(8) 60.4 22.9 +1.3 GRB
–277.6 91.105 91.138 2851.0 0.054(7) 85.9 7.7 +3.0 Sun/GOES
–277.0 91.140 91.142 129.2 0.155(7) 120.0 22.1 +1.5 GRB

–227.4c 93.197 93.200 259.1 0.054(7) 4.7 7.7 +0.7 not nova-like
–225.5c 93.260 93.305 3887.8 0.031(8) 1.9 3.9 +0.6 GOES
–176.7c 95.300 95.340 3455.4 0.064(7) 3.2 9.1 +0.5 false response
–150.8a 96.395 96.400 432.4 <0.054 4.5 <7.7 +0.3 weak
–150.8a 96.402 96.403 95.6 <0.054 4.5 <7.7 +0.7 GRB
–144.5c 96.650 96.661 950.5 0.036(8) 1.9 4.5 –0.0 false response
–103.3c 98.362 98.405 3715.1 0.048(7) 1.8 6.9 +0.7 false response
–95.6 98.687 98.714 2332.8 0.037(7) 1.8 5.3 +3.6 Sun
–88.8c 98.972 98.999 2332.8 0.034(7) 2.2 4.9 –1.7 GOES
–69.1a 99.781 99.782 86.4 >0.2 18.2 >1000 –1.2 GRB/GOES
–69.1a 99.793 99.799 518.8 <0.069 20.4 <8.0 +3.7 Sun/weak

–20.3 101.825 101.866 3542.4 0.034(7) 1.5 4.9 +1.0 too late
+24.3 103.686 103.699 1123.2 0.049(7) 2.6 7.0 –0.0 after V-maximum

Notes. The columns contain the following values: tT0 shows the temporal difference between the optical maximum T0 and the event time in units of hours; T1 and T2 are the start and end times of the feature in units of MJD+57 000; ΔT is the duration in units of s; a0 is the fitted amplitude of the nova model; χ2ν is the goodness-of-fit value, weighted by the number of degrees of freedom (reduced χ2), indicating whether a nova model is appropriate to express the light curveb; is the significance of the feature over the background in units of σ; and HR500 is the hardness ratio difference, comparing the times before, during, and after the event in units of σ. The last column provides plausible source identifications, based on the other columns, coincidences with GOES X-ray data, or the INTEGRAL response. The horizonal dashed lines indicate times for which the gamma-ray flash is “most probably” expected to occur (Gomez-Gomar et al. 1998), i.e. between days 2 and 10 before the visual maximum. (a) Two events which are coincident within a few minutes are captured by the search method as only one. This happens for example when a strong GRB precedes a solar particle event. Here, upper limits are given for fluxes and significances. (b) Because the nova light curve model is not parametrised and thus is very stiff, the resulting χ2 values are subject to extreme values and variations. We take this into account by also considering apparently bad χ2 values, up to 25σ deviations from the optimum. This declares reduced χ2 values below ≈ 4 as good, given the number of degrees of freedom of around 160. (c)Intriguing events discussed in the main text although formally excluded by specific diagnostics.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.