Table 2.
Estimates on the observed occurrence rates.
| Method | R true | K2 | MACHO |
|---|---|---|---|
| Observations | – | 91 ± 2 % | 12 ± 0.4 % |
| {A m} constraint: NO | 100 % | 83 ± 3 % | 14 ± 1 % |
| {Am} constraint: a | 100 % | 85 ± 3 % | 13 ± 1 % |
| {Am} constraint: b | 100 % | 91 ± 2 % | 14 ± 1 % |
| {A m} constraint: NO | 90 % | 74 ± 3% | 13 ± 1 % |
| {A m} constraint: a | 90 % | 76 ± 3% | 12 ± 1 % |
| {A m} constraint: b | 90 % | 81 ± 3 % | 12 ± 1 % |
Notes. All tests have been made under the assumption that the true distribution of the maximum modulation side lobes {Am} follows the observed distribution as derived on the K2 data (see Fig. 5). The type of constraint employed in the distribution of {Am} is given by the letters a and b, corresponding to the regions indicated in Fig. A.2. Statistical errors attached to the observed values are based on Alcock et al. (2003).
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.