Table 1
Results of CF meteor plasma composition analysis in comparison with the selected results of other authors.
| Spectrum | Fe | Na | Mg | Si | Ca | Cr | Mn | Ni | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Micrometeorites | 0.9 | 0.06 | 1 | 1.2 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.04 | According to [1] | |
| C1 group | 0.8 | 0.05 | 1 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 0.01 | 0.01 | Comprehensive study by [2] | |
| CM group | 0.8 | 0.03 | 1 | 1.0 | 0.07 | 0.01 | 0.04 | Comprehensive study by [3] | |
| L6 Sahara 98222 L6 | 0.9 | 1 | 1.2 | 0.1 | 0.02 | 0.02 | Calibration Free LIBS by [4] | ||
| H5 Košice | 2.1 | 0.1 | 1 | 1.3 | 0.1 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.04 | Calibration Free LIBS by [5] |
| CV3 Dhofar 1764 | 1.2 | 0.003 | 1 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.06 | Calibration Free LIBS in this study |
| LL4 Dhofar 1709 | 1.4 | 0.02 | 1 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 0.05 | 0.02 | 0.09 | |
| L4 Porangaba | 1.5 | 0.03 | 1 | 1.6 | 0.2 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.1 | |
| Halley dust | 0.5 | 0.1 | 1 | 1.8 | 0.1 | 0.01 | 0.01 | According to [6] | |
| Wild 2 | 1 | 0.005 | 0.006 | 0.005 | 0.028 | Stardust analysis [7] | |||
| Perseid 0 | 0.5 | 0.05 | 1 | 0.03 | 0.005 | 0.01 | Main component [8] | ||
| 1.0 | 1 | 2.5 | Second component [8] | ||||||
| 0.5 | 0.05 | 1 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.01 | Main component [8] | |||
| 0.9 | 1 | 1.8 | Second component [8] | ||||||
| Perseid 1 | 0.8 | 0.00074 | 1 | 0.9 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.002 | According to [9] | |
| 0.1 | |||||||||
| Perseid 2 | 0.8 | 0.0008 | 1 | 1.1 | 0.0 | 0.01 | 0.003 | ||
| 0.1 | |||||||||
| Perseid 3 | 1.0 | 0.00047 | 1 | 1.2 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.01 | ||
| 0.1 | |||||||||
| Perseid 4 | 1.1 | 0.00052 | 1 | 1.0 | 0.1 | 0.01 | 0.01 | ||
| 0.1 | |||||||||
| Leonide | 1.0 | 0.1 | 1 | 0.03 | 0.005 | 0.01 | |||
| Perseid 2015 | 1.0 | 0.0008 | 1 | 3.0 | 0.0260 | 0.001 | 0.086 | 0.02 | Calibration Free LIBS in this study |
| 0.017 | 0.52 | ||||||||
| Leonide 2015 | 1.0 | 0.00063 | 1 | 1.3 | 0.006 | 0.001 | 0.081 | 0.02 | |
| 0.013 | 0.12 |
Notes. Uncorrected and corrected data for Na and Ca are marked in italics and standard font, respectively. The estimated uncertainty of our fit is 21%. References. [1] Schramm et al. (1989); [2] Anders & Grevesse (1989); [3] Mason (1967); [4] Dell’Aglio et al. (2014); [5] Ozdin et al. (2015); [6] Jessberger et al. (1988); [7] Flynn et al. (2006); [8] Borovička & Betlem (1997); [9] Trigo-Rodriguez et al. (2003).
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.