Table C.1
Results for amplitude estimations for FMF, using different estimators (LSQ, LAD, and CHP) and models (per mode or per amplitude).
Estimator | m | η 68.3 | |
|
|||
Simulated ellipticities | |||
LSQ | per mode | 0.001(1) | 1.14(6) |
amplitude | 0.000(1) | N.A. | |
LAD | per mode | 0.0166(6) | 4.6(3) |
amplitude | 0.046(1) | 1.31(4) | |
de-g per mode | 0.0006(6) | 5.4(4) | |
amplitude | 0.022(1) | 1.61(5) | |
CHP | per amplitude | 0.043(2) | 0.83(5) |
|
|||
Added noise | |||
LSQ | per mode | –0.024(1) | 1.09(7) |
amplitude | –0.023(2) | N.A. | |
LAD | per mode | 0.014(1) | 1.47(9) |
amplitude | 0.032(2) | 0.98(7) | |
de-g per mode | –0.018(3) | 1.55(9) | |
amplitude | –0.007(2) | 1.14(8) | |
CHP | per amplitude | 0.015(2) | 0.41(3) |
Notes. Estimation bias is given in terms of a multiplicative component m as defined in Eq. (25). Efficiencies are determined relative to LSQ per individual amplitude. Numbers in parentheses reflect the standard uncertainty in the last digit.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.