Table 4
Summary of fit results for disks with cavities.
| Previously known TDs | ||||
| Name | γ | R hole | Reason | Ref. |
| (au) | ||||
|
|
||||
| MY Lup | −0.59 ± 0.01 | 34 | 1 | |
| Sz 100 | −1.5 ± 0.1 | 46 | 2 | |
| Sz 84 | −1.0 ± 0.2 | 41 | 3 | |
| J16102955-3922144 | −0.5 ± 0.64 | 31 | 4 | |
|
|
||||
| Disks with tentatively new evidence of a cavity | ||||
| Sz 129 | −0.33 ± 0.02 | 22 | 5 | |
| J16000236-4222145 | −0.20 ± 0.02 | 30 | 6 | |
|
|
||||
| Not fit | ||||
| J16083070-3828268 | large cavity | 2 | ||
| RY Lup | large cavity | 7 | ||
| Sz 111 | large cavity | 2 | ||
| Sz 123A | binary | 2, 4 | ||
| J16070854-3914075 | edge-on | 2, 4 | ||
| Sz 112 | F890 μm< 4 mJy | 5 | ||
| J16011549-4152351 | no stellar parameters | 5 | ||
| J16081497-3857145 | unresolved | (4) | ||
Notes. For four previously known TDs (top) and for two disks for which we found new evidence of a cavity (middle) we report the radial slope γ, the hole radius Rhole (estimated as the Σd(R) peak radius). We also list the disks that we have not fit (bottom) with the reason for which we have been unable to fit them.
Reference. (1) Romero et al. (2012); (2) Merín et al. (2008); (3) Merín et al. (2010); (4) Bustamante et al. (2015) (5); van der Marel et al. (2016); (7) see discussion in Ansdell et al. (2016).
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.