Free Access

Table 5

Results from the population diagrams, sorted according to the molecular fractional abundance (relative to H2) in descending order.

Molecule Trot Column density Abundance θs Lit. observational f(X) Ref. Lit. chemical model f(X) Ref.
(K) (cm-2) ′′

CO 18 (4) 1.3 (0.3) × 1017 1.1 × 10-4 18 [2–3] × 10-4 d, f 7 × 10-4–1 × 10-3 γ
13CO 21 (8) 1.6 (0.6) × 1016 1.4 × 10-5 18 [1–3] × 10-5 d, f
SO2 cold 40 (2) >1.1 (0.1) × 1016 >9.6 × 10-6 2 2 × 10-6–1 × 10-5 b, f 2 × 10-7 ϵ
SiO 17 (2) >9.1 (3.3) × 1015 >8.0 × 10-6 2 4 × 10-7–2 × 10-5 e, d 2 × 10-5–9 × 10-5 γ
SO 17 (1) 8.9 (1.6) × 1015 7.8 × 10-6 2 3 × 10-7–3 × 10-6 f, a 2 × 10-12–9 × 10-7 γ, ϵ
SiS 64 (5) 5.2 (0.6) × 1015 4.6 × 10-6 2 8 × 10-9–1 × 10-5 d 8 × 10-10–3 × 10-6 β, ϵ
SO2 warm 290 (60) >3.1 (1.0) × 1015 >2.7 × 10-6 2 2 × 10-14–4 × 10-9 γ
29SiO 17 (2) 2.1 (0.6) × 1015 1.8 × 10-6 2
PO 17 (2) 2.0 (0.4) × 1015 1.7 × 10-6 0.7 5 × 10-8–6 × 10-7 c 2 × 10-10–1 × 10-7 γ
30SiO 17 (2) 1.5 (0.5) × 1015 1.3 × 10-6 2
H2S 39 (3) 1.4  (0.3) × 1015 1.2 × 10-6 2 6 × 10-13–3 × 10-5 β, γ
34SO2 35 (6) 1.1 (0.3) × 1015 9.6 × 10-7 2
CS 25 (2) 9.2 (1.0) × 1014 8.0 × 10-7 2 8 × 10-8–3 × 10-7 f, g 2 × 10-11–2 × 10-5 γ, β
34SO 14 (1) 8.9 (2.4) × 1014 7.8 × 10-7 2
PN 18 (2) 8.3 (1.7) × 1014 7.3 × 10-7 0.7 3 × 10-7 c 4 × 10-10–6 × 10-7 γ
HCN 10 (1) >7.6 (2.9) × 1014 >6.6 × 10-7 4 4 × 10-7–1 × 10-6 i, f 6 × 10-12–3 × 10-4 γ, β
29SiS 78 (5) 4.9 (0.4) × 1014 4.3 × 10-7 2
Si34S 70 (10) 4.5 (0.8) × 1014 3.9 × 10-7 2
NaCl 67 (7) 3.5 (0.6) × 1014 3.1 × 10-7 0.3 4 × 10-9 h 4 × 10-12–1 × 10-8 γ
30SiS 83 (9) 3.5 (0.5) × 1014 3.1 × 10-7 2
H2CO 10 (2) 2.8 (0.5) × 1014 2.4 × 10-7 2 1 × 10-9–5 × 10-7 α, ϵ
CN 9 (2) 1.5 (0.7) × 1014 1.3 × 10-7 6 2 × 10-10–2 × 10-7 d, f 3 × 10-13–3 × 10-7 β, δ
Si18O 24 (8) 1.5 (0.8) × 1014 1.3 × 10-7 2
Si17O 12 (2) 1.0 (0.4) × 1014 8.7 × 10-8 2
13CS 34 (3) 9.6 (0.8) × 1013 8.4 × 10-8 2
H13CN 11 (2) 9.2 (2.5) × 1013 8.0 × 10-8 4
C34S 24 (1) 6.9 (0.6) × 1013 6.0 × 10-8 2
NS 18 (2) 2.6 (0.5) × 1013 2.3 × 10-8 6 7 × 10-13–8 × 10-9 β, δ

Notes. We give the formal uncertainties derived from the population diagram fits within parentheses. Column 5: size adopted for the emitting region. Columns 6 and 7: range of the fractional abundances given in the literature, derived from the following works based on observations: (a): Bujarrabal et al. (1994); (b): Danilovich et al. (2016); (c): De Beck et al. (2013); (d): Decin et al. (2010a); (e): González Delgado et al. (2003); (f): Kim et al. (2010); (g): Lindqvist et al. (1988): (h): Milam et al. (2007); (i): Schöier et al. (2013). Columns 8 and 9: range of the fractional abundances given in the literature, which were derived from the following chemical and shocks models: (α): Agúndez et al. (2010); (β): Duari et al. (1999); (γ): Gobrecht et al. (2016); (δ): Li et al. (2016); (ϵ): Willacy & Millar (1997).

(†)

Value given in Table 6 in Decin et al. (2010a).

(‡)

See Sect. 6.5.1.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.