Table 4
Comparison of ALFALFA and WSRT H i properties.
| HVC name | AGC |
|
SWSRT/SALFALFA |
|
||
| 210′′ | 105′′ | 210′′ | 105′′ | |||
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | ||
|
|
||||||
| HVC214.78+42.45+47 | 198606 | 0.9 | 0.9 (0.1) | 0.8 (0.1) | 0.8 (0.1) | 1.0 (0.1) |
| HVC204.88+44.86+147 | 198511 | 1.0 | 1.2 (0.1) | 1.1 (0.1) | 0.9 (0.2) | 1.5 (0.3) |
| HVC205.83+45.14+173 | 198683 | 0.8 | 0.7 (0.1) | 0.5 (0.1) | 1.3 (0.3) | 3.3 (0.8) |
| HVC217.77+58.67+96 | 208747 | 0.6 | 0.6 (0.1) | 0.6 (0.1) | 1.1 (0.2) | 1.6 (0.4) |
| HVC212.68+62.39+64 | 208753 | 0.8 | 0.8 (0.1) | 0.8 (0.1) | 0.9 (0.1) | 1.3 (0.3) |
| HVC230.27+71.10+76 | 219663 | 0.8 | 0.9 (0.1) | 0.7 (0.1) | 1.1 (0.2) | 1.7 (0.5) |
| HVC235.38+74.79+195 | 219656 | 1.1 | 1.4 (0.2) | 1.2 (0.1) | 1.0 (0.2) | 1.7 (0.4) |
| HVC271.57+79.03+248 | 229326 | 0.7 | 0.8 (0.1) | 0.8 (0.1) | 1.1 (0.2) | 1.8 (0.5) |
| HVC276.53+79.84+255 | 229327 | 0.8 | 0.7 (0.1) | 0.7 (0.1) | 1.2 (0.3) | 2.7 (0.7) |
| HVC028.09+71.87-142 | 249393 | ... | ... | ... | 1.2a | ... |
| HVC011.76+67.89+60 | 249525 | 0.8 | 0.8 (0.1) | 0.8 (0.1) | 0.9 (0.1) | 1.2 (0.2) |
| HVC015.96+63.90+44 | 249565 | 0.7 | 1.0 (0.1) | 1.0 (0.1) | 1.3 (0.2) | 2.1 (0.4) |
Notes. Table columns are as follows: Col. 1: the HVC name of the source as for Table 1; Col. 2: AGC number as in Table 1; Col. 3: the ratio of the WSRT half-flux size to the ALFALFA half-flux size; Col. 4: the ratio of the WSRT integrated flux density to the ALFALFA integrated flux density for both the 210′′ and 105′′ data; Col. 5: the ratio of the peak WSRT column (for both the 210′′ and 105′′ data) to the ALFALFA 
.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.