Table 5
Parameters of the dust species considered in this study.
Dust species | Density | Complex refractive indexa | Sublimation parametersh | |||||||||||
ρ d | n | log 10(k1) | Refs. |
![]() |
ℬ′ | log 10(J1700 K) | Refs. | |||||||
[g cm-3] | [104 K] | [cgs] | ||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
Iron (Fe) | 7.87 | 3.5b | 0.50 ± 0.50 c | O88 | 4.84 ± 0.12 | 31.3 ± 0.7 | − 4.8 ± 0.4 | F04 | ||||||
Silicon monoxide (SiO) | 2.13 | 1.9 | see note (d) | P85, W13 | 4.95 ± 0.14 | 31.2 ± 1.0 | − 5.1 ± 0.6 | G13 | ||||||
Cryst. fayalite (Fe2SiO4) | 4.39 | 1.8 | − 2.25 ± 0.25 | Z11, F01 | 6.04 ± 0.11 | 38.1 ± 0.7i | − 4.8 ± 0.4 | N94 | ||||||
Cryst. enstatite (MgSiO3) | 3.20 | 1.6e | − 4.25 ± 0.25 e | D95, J98 | 6.89 ± 0.88 | 37.8 ± 5.0i | − 7.1 ± 3.1 | M88, K91 | ||||||
Cryst. forsterite (Mg2SiO4) | 3.27 | 1.6 | − 3.75 ± 0.25 | Z11, F01 | 6.53 ± 0.40 | 34.3 ± 2.5 | − 7.8 ± 1.5 | G10, N94 | ||||||
Quartz (SiO2) | 2.60 | 1.6f | − 3.25 ± 0.25 f | Z13 | 6.94 ± 0.34 | 35.1 ± 1.8 | − 8.5 ± 1.2 | H90 | ||||||
Corundum (Al2O3) | 4.00 | 1.6g | − 1.75 ± 0.25 cg | K95 | 7.74 ± 0.39j | 39.3 ± 2.0j | − 8.7 ± 1.3 | S04, L08 | ||||||
Silicon carbide (SiC) | 3.22 | 2.5 | − 3.50 ± 0.25 | La93 | 7.85 ± 0.39j | 37.4 ± 1.9ij | − 9.8 ± 1.3 | Li93 | ||||||
Graphite (C) | 2.16 | 3.2b | − 0.25 ± 0.50 | D84 | 9.36 ± 0.05 | 36.2 ± 1.8ij | − 14.2 ± 0.8 | Z73 |
Notes. The list only includes crystalline species because amorphous dust is expected to anneal rapidly (see Sect. 4.2.3 of Kimura et al. 2002).
See text and Appendix B on how the values for n and k1 were derived from the wavelength-dependent complex-refractive-index data.
For iron and graphite, n(λ) steadily rises in the wavelength regime considered (see Fig. B.1).
For iron and corundum, the best-matching k1 values give temperatures that are slightly too low (see Appendix B).
Our two-parameter complex-refractive-index recipe cannot reproduce the Td(s) profile of SiO (see Appendix B).
The n(λ) and k(λ) data we use for quartz only cover wavelengths of 3 μm and higher. To compute n and k1, these were extrapolated down.
The data of Koike et al. (1995) were obtained using a material consisting mostly of γ-Al2O3, while corundum is α-Al2O3.
Additional notes and details on the sublimation parameters can be found in Table 3 of Paper I.
For these materials, no measurements of the evaporation coefficient α are available. In the computation of ℬ′, we arbitrarily adopt α = 0.1.
For sublimation parameters without a reported uncertainty, we set the standard deviation on and/or ℬ to 5%, which is comparable to the level of uncertainty of sublimation parameters that do include an error bar.
Reference. D84: Draine & Lee (1984); D95: Dorschner et al. (1995); F01: Fabian et al. (2001); F04: Ferguson et al. (2004); G10: Gail (2010); G13: Gail et al. (2013); H90: Hashimoto (1990); J98: Jaeger et al. (1998); K91: Kushiro & Mysen (1991); K95: Koike et al. (1995); La93: Laor & Draine (1993); Li93: Lilov (1993); L08: Lihrmann (2008); M88: Mysen & Kushiro (1988); N94: Nagahara et al. (1994); O88: Ordal et al. (1988); P85: Palik (1985); S04: Schaefer & Fegley (2004); W13: Wetzel et al. (2013); Z73: Zavitsanos & Carlson (1973); Z11: Zeidler et al. (2011); Z13: Zeidler et al. (2013).
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.