Table 2
Binary fit results.
Target | Filter | Date | Contrast | Significance | Comment |
[dd/mm/yy] | [mag] | ||||
|
|||||
DM Tau | K ′ | 08/01/12 | 6.8 ± 0.3 | 4.27 | Detection |
FP Tau | K′ | 20/10/13 | 4.4 ± 1.2 | 5.99 | Disc detection |
L′ | 20/10/13 | 4.1 ± 0.3 | 3.55 | Non-detection | |
LkHα 330 | CH4s | 16/11/13 | 5.7 ± 0.3 | 3.39 | Non-detection |
K′ | 08/01/12 | 5.6 ± 0.2 | 4.73 | Detection | |
RXJ 1615.3-3255 | K′ | 09/06/14 | 4.9 ± 0.2 | 4.77 | False positive |
RXJ 1842.9-3532 | K′ | 09/06/14 | 5.5 ± 0.2 | 3.72 | False positive |
TW Hya | K′ | 08/01/12 | 5.6 ± 0.2 | 4.46 | Detection |
K′ | 10/01/12 | 3.7 ± 1.4 | 3.63 | Non-detection | |
V2062 Oph | K′ | 09/06/14 | 5.00 ± 0.2 | 5.52 | False positive |
V2246 Oph | K′ | 09/06/14 | 4.3 ± 0.5 | 1.97 | Non-detection |
Notes.Criterion for detection or non-detection is based on a σ of greater than 4.0 representing a confidence level greater than 88%. However there are effects which can mimic a detection of between 4−5σ so for these cases which look individually at each target and try attempt to rule them out through inspection of their reconstructed images, significance maps, uv-coverage and visibilities. Detections close to 6.0 σ (>99.9% confidence level) are considered strong enough that closer examination is not required. Classification as a disc detection is based upon identification of a strong double lobing. An asterisk denotes cases where we see a strong degeneracy.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.