Free Access

This article has an erratum: [https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201628601e]


Fig. 6

image

Comparison between the O/H abundances derived from HCm with the empirical calibration of the O3N2 parameter given by Pérez-Montero & Contini (2009). In this case HCm O/H values were calculated without a previous determination of N/O, but assuming the expected O/H-N/O relation. Density of points over the mean value are represented according to the colour bar. The red solid line represents the 1:1 relation. The upper left cross represents the standard deviations of the residuals of both methods as compared to the direct method carried out by Pérez-Montero & Contini (2009) and Pérez-Montero (2014).

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.