The (w)hole survey: An unbiased sample study of transition disk candidates based on Spitzer catalogs

N. van der Marel; B. W. Verhaar; S. van Terwisga; B. Merín; G. Herczeg; N. F. W. Ligterink; E. F. van Dishoeck

doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201628075

Home

All issues

Volume 592 (August 2016)

A&A, 592 (2016) A126

Full HTML

Free Access

Table 7

Comparison cavity radii with literature values.


ID	Name			Type^a	Ref.	ID	Name			Type^a	Ref.



1	TCha	140	19	I	1	51	IRS48	120	60	I	13
3	RECX5	10	33	M	2	52	DoAr44	80	30	I	10
4	CHXR22E	45	7	M	3	54	SR21	60	36	I	8
6	CSCha	60	38	M	4	60	oph62	2⁺²	3	M	6
9	T54	120	37	M	3	64	J160421	70	80	I	14
10	T21	190_-10	146	M	3	120	J182911	10	8	M	6
11	SZCha	30	29	M	3	127	Serp127	80	25	M	6
12	T35	15	15	M	3	128	J182935	25	7	M	6
14	T56	10	18	M	3	135	DMTau	4	18	I	10
15	CRCha	1⁺¹	10	M	4	136	UXTauA	50	25	I	10
18	T25	30	8	M	3	142	MWC758	25	73	I	10
21	HD142527	110	100	I	5	148	IPTau	100	2	M	4
24	Lup60	16	3	M	6	153	RYTau	2⁺²	26^b	I	15
27	Sz91	120	97	I	7	159	ABAur	1⁺⁴	115	I	16
29	Sz84	70	55	M	6	161	ASR118	2⁺⁴	1	M	6
33	HD135344	80	46	I	8	165	J034227	8	5	M	6
35	Sz76	2⁺²	1	M	9	168	J034434	5	3	M	6
38	RXJ1615	10	30	I	10	169	IC348LRL190	2⁺²	5	M	6
39	V4046Sgr	16	29	I	11	173	LkH-alpha330	120	68	I	10
45	SR24S	50	30	I	10	309	TWHya	10	4	M	17
46	RXJ1633	20	27	I	12	325	LkCa15	80	50	I	10
48	WSB60	8	15	I	10	326	CoKu-Tau-4	6	10	M	18
50	J162245	2⁺²	1	M	6	329	GMAur	30	20	I	10

Notes.

^(a)

M = derived from SED modeling, I = derived from millimeter imaging.

^(b)

This value is not a real cavity size, but a transition radius: the disk was fit with a surface density profile that radially increases and decreases, peaking at 26 AU.

Reference. (1) Huélamo et al. (2015); (2) Bouwman et al. (2010); (3) Kim et al. (2009); (4) Espaillat et al. (2011); (5) Fukagawa et al. (2013); (6) Merín et al. (2010); (7) Canovas et al. (2015); (8) Brown et al. (2009); (9) Padgett et al. (2006); (10) Andrews et al. (2011); (11) Rosenfeld et al. (2013); (12) Cieza et al. (2012a); (13) van der Marel et al. (2013); (14) Mathews et al. (2012); (15) Isella et al. (2010a); (16) Piétu et al. (2005); (17) Andrews et al. (2012); (18) D’Alessio et al. (2005).

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.