Table 3
Quick comparison of the main characteristics of our sample with respect to those by other authors we compare (see text and Fig. 2).
| Reference | z | Stellar mass range | Compactness definition | Supplementary galaxy selections |
|
|
||||
| This work | 0 ≲ z ≲ 1.6 | M⋆> 1011 | Σ ≥ 2500 M⊙ pc-2 | Elliptical morphology |
| (Visual classification) | ||||
| Trujillo et al. (2009) | 0 <z< 0.2 | M⋆> 8 × 1010 | Re< 1.5 kpc | – |
| Taylor et al. (2010) | 0.066 <z< 0.12 | M⋆> 1011 | log(Re,z/kpc) < | (u−r) > 2.5 |
| 0.56 × (log(M⋆/M⊙) – 9.84) – 0.3 | ||||
| Valentinuzzi et al. (2010) | 0.04 <z< 0.07 | 8 × 1010<M⋆< 4 × 1011M⊙ | Σ > 3000 M⊙pc-2 | – |
| Damjanov et al. (2015) | 0.2 <z< 0.8 | M⋆> 8 × 1010 | log(Re/kpc) < | NUVrJ colours |
| 0.568 × log(M⋆/M⊙) – 5.74 | ||||
| Bezanson et al. (2009) | z = 2.5 | M⋆> 1011 | – | Quiescent |
| Cassata et al. (2013) | 1.2 <z< 1.6 | M⋆> 1011 | Σ ≥ 2500 M⊙ pc-2 | sSFR< 10-11 yr-1 |
| + elliptical morphology | ||||
| van der Wel et al. (2014) | 0 ≲ z ≲ 1.6 | M⋆ > 5 × 1010 | Re/(M⋆/1011M⊙)0.75< 1.5 kpc | UVJ red colours |
Notes. Column 1: reference paper; Col. 2: redshift range; Col. 3: stellar mass limits (for Taylor et al. and Cassata et al. is reported the one we use); Col. 4: compactness definition; Col. 5: other supplementary selections applied to the samples.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.