Free Access

This article has an erratum: [https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201628581e]


Table 5

Best-fit parameters for AI Phe from detrended 85-mm and 200-mm data, with the priors, ecosω = −0.064 ± 0.004 and esinω = 0.176 ± 0.003.

Parameter 85-mm 200-mm
Detrend Difference Detrend Difference
with priors to no priors with priors to no priors

J 0.4346(68) −0.0010 0.388(15) 0.003
r sum 0.09909(31) −0.00007 0.0997(7) 0.006
k 1.582(15) −0.004 1.546(47) 0.012
i (°) 88.535(48) 0.014 88.68(17) −0.06
ecosω −0.06558(7) 0.00001 −0.06468(21) 0.00011
esinω 0.1654(28) −0.0018 0.185(5) 0.007
l 3 0.057(13) 0.002 0.107(39) 0.009

r 1 0.03838(37) 0.00003 0.0392(12) 0.0000
r 2 0.06071(29) −0.00010 0.0606(8) 0.0005
e 0.1780(30) 0.0017 0.196(6) 0.007
ω (°) 111.63(32) 0.20 109.28(46) −0.69

Notes. The difference from the best-fit parameters without priors is included for comparison. Standard errors on the final two digits of each parameter value are given in the parentheses and include the contribution from the uncertainties in the limb darkening coefficients used.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.