Table 5
Results of the MCMC statistical analysis for the strong lensing models of Table 4.
| F1 | F2 | W1 | W2 | L1 | L2 | |||||||
| Median | 68% CL | Median | 68% CL | Median | 68% CL | Median | 68% CL | Median | 68% CL | Median | 68% CL | |
|
|
||||||||||||
| x(″) | −0.52 |
|
−0.42 |
|
−0.59 |
|
−0.42 |
|
−0.57 |
|
−0.42 |
|
| y(″) | 0.54 |
|
0.56 |
|
0.56 |
|
0.57 |
|
0.54 |
|
0.58 |
|
| ε | 0.61 |
|
0.59 |
|
0.61 |
|
0.58 |
|
0.61 |
|
0.58 |
|
| θ(deg) | −37.43 |
|
−37.29 |
|
−37.45 |
|
−37.29 |
|
−37.44 |
|
−37.29 |
|
| rcore(″) | 19.95 |
|
19.04 |
|
21.33 |
|
19.44 |
|
21.35 |
|
19.56 |
|
| σv(km s-1) | 1535 |
|
1532 |
|
1540 |
|
1528 |
|
1590 |
|
1580 |
|
|
270 |
|
166 |
|
318 |
|
181 |
|
325 |
|
191 |
|
|
86 |
|
95 |
|
83 |
|
88 |
|
83 |
|
93 |
|
|
14.7 |
|
16.7 |
|
12.0 |
|
15.3 |
|
11.4 |
|
14.9 |
|
|
125 |
|
128 |
|
132 |
|
130 |
|
139 |
|
136 |
|
| Ωm | − | − | − | − | 0.25 |
|
0.25 |
|
0.31 |
|
0.35 |
|
| ΩΛ | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | 0.38 |
|
0.36 |
|
| w | − | − | − | − | −1.20 |
|
−1.07 |
|
− | − | − | − |
| z 9 | − | − | 2.48 |
|
− | − | 2.48 |
|
− | − | 2.47 |
|
| z 13 | − | − | 1.27 |
|
− | − | 1.26 |
|
− | − | 1.26 |
|
| z 15 | − | − | 3.14 |
|
− | − | 3.14 |
|
− | − | 3.12 |
|
| z16 | − | − | 1.43 |
|
− | − | 1.43 |
|
− | − | 1.43 |
|
| z 17 | − | − | 2.39 |
|
− | − | 2.41 |
|
− | − | 2.40 |
|
| z 20 | − | − | 3.11 |
|
− | − | 3.11 |
|
− | − | 3.09 |
|
| z 21 | − | − | 3.49 |
|
− | − | 3.51 |
|
− | − | 3.49 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||
| FZ1 | FZ2 | W3 | L3 | WL1 | WL2 | |||||||
| Median | 68% CL | Median | 68% CL | Median | 68% CL | Median | 68% CL | Median | 68% CL | Median | 68% CL | |
|
|
||||||||||||
| x(″) | −0.62 |
|
−0.31 |
|
−0.49 |
|
−0.46 |
|
−0.56 |
|
−0.42 |
|
| y(″) | 0.56 |
|
0.42 |
|
0.59 |
|
0.59 |
|
0.54 |
|
0.57 |
|
| ε | 0.69 |
|
0.61 |
|
0.59 |
|
0.58 |
|
0.61 |
|
0.58 |
|
| θ(deg) | −37.43 |
|
−37.23 |
|
−37.19 |
|
−37.21 |
|
−37.44 |
|
−37.29 |
|
| rcore(″) | 21.07 |
|
19.50 |
|
19.89 |
|
19.80 |
|
21.46 |
|
19.56 |
|
| σv(km s-1) | 1487 |
|
1495 |
|
1565 |
|
1575 |
|
1600 |
|
1590 |
|
|
|
383 |
|
243 |
|
244 |
|
219 |
|
334 |
|
199 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
94 |
|
96 |
|
97 |
|
90 |
|
90 |
|
|
|
28.1 |
|
16.1 |
|
11.7 |
|
12.2 |
|
12.3 |
|
14.7 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
134 |
|
151 |
|
147 |
|
137 |
|
137 |
|
| Ωm | − | − | − | − | 0.49 |
|
0.41 |
|
0.32 |
|
0.33 |
|
| ΩΛ | − | − | − | − | − | − | 0.40 |
|
0.29 |
|
0.32 |
|
| w | − | − | − | − | −1.07 |
|
− | − | −0.97 |
|
−0.83 |
|
| z 9 | − | − | 3.30 |
|
2.39 |
|
2.43 |
|
− | − | 2.46 |
|
| z 13 | − | − | 1.42 |
|
1.26 |
|
1.26 |
|
− | − | 1.26 |
|
| z 15 | − | − | 4.75 |
|
2.92 |
|
3.00 |
|
− | − | 3.10 |
|
| z 16 | − | − | 1.60 |
|
1.43 |
|
1.43 |
|
− | − | 1.43 |
|
| z 17 | − | − | 3.03 |
|
2.31 |
|
2.36 |
|
− | − | 2.39 |
|
| z 20 | − | − | 4.68 |
|
2.93 |
|
3.00 |
|
− | − | 3.08 |
|
| z 21 | − | − | 5.62 |
|
3.25 |
|
3.36 |
|
− | − | 3.47 |
|
Notes. IDs correspond to the models in the Table 4. For the models FZ1 and FZ2 the best-fit redshift values of the families 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 14 and 18 are omitted to improve visualisation. The values of all velocity dispersions (σv) are corrected by the factor 
as described in the lenstool manual (see http://projets.lam.fr/projects/lenstool/wiki/PIEMD).
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.