Fig. 2

Comparison of the constant density and two-zone analytical models, as described in Sects. 3.3 and 3.4, with the full calculations as described in Sect. 4.1 in terms of the predicted relative Applegate threshold energy. We consider the same general system configuration as in Fig. 1 and described in Sect. 3.4, but fixed the secondary mass to Msec = 0.3 M⊙, which enabled us to plot the calculated energies as functions of the Applegate parameter A (see Eq. (37)). The analytical two-zone model closely follows the full calculations with typical deviations of less than 10%, while the simple constant density model overestimates the energy threshold by several magnitudes except for the critical region close to unity.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.