Free Access

Table D.3

HAT-P-7b 95% credibility regions, parameters of the maximum a posteriori models and associated goodness-of-fit criteria for scenarios from Table 2.

Scenario 95% credibility regions best-fit VP BIC ΔBIC pM

Standard + asy 0.26 <AS< 0.31 AS = 0.30 217.23 3.68 246.56 0 1
0.37 <ϵ< 0.99 ϵ = 0.93
1.69 <MP< 1.81 Mjup MP = 1.79 Mjup
0.003 <dS< 0.27 dS = 0.002
90 <lstart< 102° lstart = 93°
126 <lend< 137° lend = 126°

Standard + both 0.26 <AS< 0.35 AS = 0.34 214.74 3.70 248.26 1.7 0.42
0.19 <ϵ< 0.93 ϵ = 0.34
1.64 <MP< 1.84 Mjup MP = 1.81 Mjup
0.01 <dS< 0.66 dS = 0.005
90 <lstart< 122° lstart = 91°
122 <lend< 148° lend = 121°
104 <θday< 263° θday = 259°

Standard + off 0.21 <AS< 0.34 AS = 0.34 247.34 4.05 268.29 21.73 1.9 × 10-5
0.02 <ϵ< 0.44 ϵ = 0.007
1.53 <MP< 1.76 Mjup MP = 1.75 Mjup
118 <θday< 233° θday = 234°

Standard 0.27 <AS< 0.29 AS = 0.29 669.74 10.80 686.50 439.94 0
0.78 <ϵ< 0.99 ϵ = 0.99
1.69 <MP< 1.79 Mjup MP = 1.75 Mjup

Free A 0.27 <AS< 0.29 AS = 0.29 669.64 10.97 690.59 444.03 0
0.18 <AB< 0.78 AB = 0.75
0.14 <ϵ< 0.99 ϵ = 0.96
1.69 <MP< 1.79 Mjup MP = 1.74 Mjup

Free T 0.28 <AS< 0.29 AS = 0.29 669.68 10.97 690.62 444.06 0
739 <Td<2058 K Td = 1204 K
521 <Tn< 1834 K Tn = 512 K
1.70 <MP< 1.79 Mjup MP = 1.75 Mjup

Esteves et al. (2013) 276.41 4.53 297.36 50.8 9.3 × 10-12

Notes. Models are ranked by BIC. Model probability ratios pM are stated (see Eq. (32)). For comparison, we also state goodness-of-fit criteria for the best-fit model of Esteves et al. (2013), their Fig. 3.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.