Table 1
Rotational states and summary of used photometry for asteroids for which we updated their shape models based on new disk-integrated optical data.
Asteroid | λ 1 | β 1 | λ 2 | β 2 | P | N lc | N app | N LOW | Original model | ||
[deg] | [deg] | [deg] | [deg] | [h] | published by | ||||||
|
|||||||||||
3 | Juno | 104 | 20 | 7.209532 | 38 | 11 | 332 | Kaasalainen et al. (2002) | |||
7 | Iris | 19 | 19 | 198 | 5 | 7.138843 | 39 | 14 | 372 | Kaasalainen et al. (2002) | |
16 | Psyche | 32 | −7 | 4.195948 | 118 | 19 | 567 | Kaasalainen et al. (2002) | |||
17 | Thetis | 240 | 22 | 12.26603 | 57 | 10 | 690 | Ďurech et al. (2009) | |||
19 | Fortuna | 96 | 56 | 7.44322 | 48 | 11 | 565 | Torppa et al. (2003) | |||
20 | Massalia | 304 | 76 | 124 | 81 | 8.09759 | 36 | 9 | 380 | Kaasalainen et al. (2002) | |
22 | Kalliope | 196 | 4 | 4.148201 | 102 | 17 | 343 | Kaasalainen et al. (2002) | |||
23 | Thalia | 159 | −40 | 12.31241 | 50 | 12 | 466 | Torppa et al. (2003) | |||
27 | Euterpe | 82 | 44 | 265 | 39 | 10.40193 | 54 | 6 | Stephens et al. (2012) | ||
29 | Amphitrite | 136 | −20 | 5.390119 | 66 | 15 | 323 | Kaasalainen et al. (2002) | |||
39 | Laetitia | 322 | 30 | 5.138238 | 68 | 26 | 448 | Kaasalainen et al. (2002) | |||
40 | Harmonia | 22 | 34 | 8.90848 | 23 | 7 | 405 | Hanuš et al. (2011) | |||
41 | Daphne | 199 | −30 | 5.98798 | 33 | 8 | 508 | Kaasalainen et al. (2002) | |||
42 | Isis | 113 | 45 | 13.58364 | 31 | 8 | 499 | Hanuš et al. (2011) | |||
45 | Eugenia | 125 | −34 | 5.699151 | 101 | 16 | 574 | Hanuš et al. (2013b) | |||
54 | Alexandra | 152 | 19 | 7.02264 | 38 | 8 | 506 | Warner et al. (2008b) | |||
64 | Angelina | 135 | 6 | 315 | 5 | 8.75171 | 24 | 4 | 450 | Ďurech et al. (2011) | |
76 | Freia | 138 | 12 | 319 | 17 | 9.97306 | 57 | 12 | 463 | Marciniak et al. (2012) | |
87 | Sylvia | 82 | 64 | 5.183641 | 55 | 12 | 545 | Kaasalainen et al. (2002), Berthier et al. (2014) | |||
88 | Thisbe | 82 | 69 | 6.04132 | 28 | 8 | 554 | Torppa et al. (2003) | |||
94 | Aurora | 65 | 9 | 242 | −7 | 7.22619 | 22 | 8 | 550 | Marciniak et al. (2011) | |
95 | Arethusa | 119 | 23 | 8.70221 | 15 | 2 | 417 | Ďurech et al. (2011) | |||
107 | Camilla | 72 | 51 | 4.843928 | 34 | 10 | 543 | Torppa et al. (2003) | |||
110 | Lydia | 148 | −39 | 340 | −57 | 10.92581 | 53 | 11 | 398 | Ďurech et al. (2007) | |
121 | Hermione | 1 | 16 | 5.550881 | 48 | 9 | 536 | Descamps et al. (2009) | |||
129 | Antigone | 211 | 55 | 4.957160 | 52 | 11 | 535 | Torppa et al. (2003) | |||
130 | Elektra | 176 | −89 | 5.224663 | 56 | 13 | 358 | Ďurech et al. (2007) | |||
354 | Eleonora | 162 | 43 | 4.277184 | 64 | 13 | 482 | Hanuš et al. (2011) | |||
360 | Carlova | 3 | 56 | 143 | 67 | 6.18959 | 9 | 4 | 435 | Ďurech et al. (2009) | |
372 | Palma | 234 | −5 | 51 | 54 | 8.57964 | 38 | 8 | 406 | Hanuš et al. (2011) | |
386 | Siegena | 289 | 25 | 9.76503 | 83 | 12 | 460 | Marciniak et al. (2012) | |||
409 | Aspasia | 2 | 28 | 9.02145 | 22 | 8 | 438 | Warner et al. (2008b), Hanuš et al. (2013b) | |||
423 | Diotima | 351 | 4 | 4.775377 | 58 | 12 | 540 | Ďurech et al. (2007) | |||
511 | Davida | 298 | 22 | 5.129365 | 58 | 17 | 588 | Torppa et al. (2003) | |||
532 | Herculina | 100 | 9 | 9.40494 | 74 | 11 | 410 | Kaasalainen et al. (2002) | |||
776 | Berbericia | 346 | 25 | 7.66701 | 59 | 11 | 402 | Ďurech et al. (2007) |
Notes. We also provide the reference to the original model and in two cases to the plausible non-convex model as well. The table gives ecliptic coordinates λ1 and β1 of the best-fitting pole solution, ecliptic coordinates λ2 and β2 for the possible second (mirror) pole solution, sidereal rotational period P, the number of dense lightcurves Nlc spanning Napp apparitions, the number of sparse-in-time measurements from Lowell NLOW, and the reference to the original model.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.