Free Access

Table 1

Rotational states and summary of used photometry for asteroids for which we updated their shape models based on new disk-integrated optical data.

Asteroid λ 1 β 1 λ 2 β 2 P N lc N app N LOW Original model
[deg] [deg] [deg] [deg] [h] published by

3     Juno 104 20 7.209532 38 11 332 Kaasalainen et al. (2002)
7     Iris 19 19 198 5 7.138843 39 14 372 Kaasalainen et al. (2002)
16     Psyche 32 7 4.195948 118 19 567 Kaasalainen et al. (2002)
17     Thetis 240 22 12.26603 57 10 690 Ďurech et al. (2009)
19     Fortuna 96 56 7.44322 48 11 565 Torppa et al. (2003)
20     Massalia 304 76 124 81 8.09759 36 9 380 Kaasalainen et al. (2002)
22     Kalliope 196 4 4.148201 102 17 343 Kaasalainen et al. (2002)
23     Thalia 159 40 12.31241 50 12 466 Torppa et al. (2003)
27     Euterpe 82 44 265 39 10.40193 54 6 Stephens et al. (2012)
29     Amphitrite 136 20 5.390119 66 15 323 Kaasalainen et al. (2002)
39     Laetitia 322 30 5.138238 68 26 448 Kaasalainen et al. (2002)
40     Harmonia 22 34 8.90848 23 7 405 Hanuš et al. (2011)
41     Daphne 199 30 5.98798 33 8 508 Kaasalainen et al. (2002)
42     Isis 113 45 13.58364 31 8 499 Hanuš et al. (2011)
45     Eugenia 125 34 5.699151 101 16 574 Hanuš et al. (2013b)
54     Alexandra 152 19 7.02264 38 8 506 Warner et al. (2008b)
64     Angelina 135 6 315 5 8.75171 24 4 450 Ďurech et al. (2011)
76     Freia 138 12 319 17 9.97306 57 12 463 Marciniak et al. (2012)
87     Sylvia 82 64 5.183641 55 12 545 Kaasalainen et al. (2002), Berthier et al. (2014)
88     Thisbe 82 69 6.04132 28 8 554 Torppa et al. (2003)
94     Aurora 65 9 242 7 7.22619 22 8 550 Marciniak et al. (2011)
95     Arethusa 119 23 8.70221 15 2 417 Ďurech et al. (2011)
107     Camilla 72 51 4.843928 34 10 543 Torppa et al. (2003)
110     Lydia 148 39 340 57 10.92581 53 11 398 Ďurech et al. (2007)
121     Hermione 1 16 5.550881 48 9 536 Descamps et al. (2009)
129     Antigone 211 55 4.957160 52 11 535 Torppa et al. (2003)
130     Elektra 176 89 5.224663 56 13 358 Ďurech et al. (2007)
354     Eleonora 162 43 4.277184 64 13 482 Hanuš et al. (2011)
360     Carlova 3 56 143 67 6.18959 9 4 435 Ďurech et al. (2009)
372     Palma 234 5 51 54 8.57964 38 8 406 Hanuš et al. (2011)
386     Siegena 289 25 9.76503 83 12 460 Marciniak et al. (2012)
409     Aspasia 2 28 9.02145 22 8 438 Warner et al. (2008b), Hanuš et al. (2013b)
423     Diotima 351 4 4.775377 58 12 540 Ďurech et al. (2007)
511     Davida 298 22 5.129365 58 17 588 Torppa et al. (2003)
532     Herculina 100 9 9.40494 74 11 410 Kaasalainen et al. (2002)
776     Berbericia 346 25 7.66701 59 11 402 Ďurech et al. (2007)

Notes. We also provide the reference to the original model and in two cases to the plausible non-convex model as well. The table gives ecliptic coordinates λ1 and β1 of the best-fitting pole solution, ecliptic coordinates λ2 and β2 for the possible second (mirror) pole solution, sidereal rotational period P, the number of dense lightcurves Nlc spanning Napp apparitions, the number of sparse-in-time measurements from Lowell NLOW, and the reference to the original model.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.