Table 2
Set of characteristics and parameters used in the different tests to examine the robustness of the STECKMAP solutions.
Test | Models | Age range (yr) | Kinematics | μ x | μ Z | μ v | rms |
|
|||||||
1 | Vazdekis et al. (2010) | [0.063 × 109, 17.8 × 109] | FIX | 10-2 | 102 | –** | 0.1215 |
2 | Vazdekis et al. (2010) + | [0.001 × 109, 17.8 × 109] | FIX | 10-2 | 102 | – | 0.1298 |
González Delgado et al. (2005) | |||||||
3 | Vazdekis et al. (2010) | [0.063 × 109, 13.5 × 109] | FIX | 10-2 | 102 | – | 0.1216 |
4 | Vazdekis et al. (2010) + | [0.001 × 109, 13.5 × 109] | FIX | 10-2 | 102 | – | 0.1298 |
González Delgado et al. (2005) | |||||||
5 | Vazdekis et al. (2010) | [0.063 × 109, 17.8 × 109] | FIT | 10-2 | 102 | 10-2 | 0.1670 |
6 | Vazdekis et al. (2010) + | [0.001 × 109, 17.8 × 109] | FIT | 10-2 | 102 | 10-2 | 0.1764 |
González Delgado et al. (2005) | |||||||
7 | Vazdekis et al. (2010) | [0.063 × 109, 13.5 × 109] | FIT | 10-2 | 102 | 10-2 | 0.1768 |
8 | Vazdekis et al. (2010) + | [0.001 × 109, 13.5 × 109] | FIT | 10-2 | 102 | 10-2 | 0.1766 |
González Delgado et al. (2005) | |||||||
9 | Vazdekis et al. (2010) | [0.063 × 109, 17.8 × 109] | FIX | 102 | 102 | – | 0.1218 |
10 | Vazdekis et al. (2010) | [0.063 × 109, 17.8 × 109] | FIX | 10-2 | 10-2 | – | 0.1217 |
11 | Vazdekis et al. (2010) | [0.063 × 109, 17.8 × 109] | FIX | 10-6 | 105 | – | 0.1224 |
12 | Vazdekis et al. (2010) | [0.063 × 109, 17.8 × 109] | FIX | 10-8 | 10-8 | – | 0.1217 |
13 | Vazdekis et al. (2010) | [0.063 × 109, 17.8 × 109] | FIX | 104 | 105 | – | 0.1223 |
14 | Vazdekis et al. (2010) | [0.063 × 109, 17.8 × 109] | FIX | 1015 | 1014 | – | 0.1224 |
15 | Vazdekis et al. (2010) | [0.063 × 109, 17.8 × 109] | FIX | 10-15 | 10-14 | – | 0.1217 |
16 | Vazdekis et al. (2010) | [0.063 × 109, 17.8 × 109] | FIX | 10-2 | 106 | – | 0.1227 |
17 | Vazdekis et al. (2010) | [0.063 × 109, 13.5 × 109] | FIX | 102 | 102 | – | 0.1218 |
18 | Vazdekis et al. (2010) | [0.063 × 109, 13.5 × 109] | FIX | 10-2 | 10-2 | – | 0.1218 |
19 | Vazdekis et al. (2010) | [0.063 × 109, 13.5 × 109] | FIX | 10-6 | 105 | – | 0.1226 |
20 | Vazdekis et al. (2010) | [0.063 × 109, 13.5 × 109] | FIX | 10-8 | 10-8 | – | 0.1218 |
21 | Vazdekis et al. (2010) | [0.063 × 109, 13.5 × 109] | FIX | 104 | 105 | – | 0.1224 |
22 | Vazdekis et al. (2010) | [0.063 × 109, 13.5 × 109] | FIX | 1015 | 1014 | – | 0.1249 |
23 | Vazdekis et al. (2010) | [0.063 × 109, 13.5 × 109] | FIX | 10-15 | 10-14 | – | 0.1218 |
24* | Vazdekis et al. (2010) | [0.063 × 109, 13.5 × 109] | FIX | 10-2 | 106 | – | 0.1225 |
Notes. Column 1 is the number of the test. Column 2 shows the models used in each test, i.e. Vazdekis et al. (2010) or Vazdekis et al. (2010)+González Delgado et al. (2005). Column 3 gives the age range. In Col. 4 we highlight the fact of fitting or fixing the kinematics. μx stands for “smoothing parameter for the stellar age distribution”, μZ stands for “smoothing parameter for the age-Z relation”, and μv stands for “smoothing parameter for the line-of-sight velocity distribution”. The last column gives the quality of each of the tests by means of its residuals rms computed as the mean values of the absolute differences between the data and the fit.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.