Table 2
Comparison of integrated magnitudes to the literature.
| Object | Band | mMUSE [mag] | mlit − mMUSE [mag] |
|
|
|||
| θ1 Ori B | V | 7.990 | –0.03a |
| R | 7.760 | ||
| I | 7.422 | ||
| θ2 Ori B | V | 6.389 | 0.009a, 0.021d |
| R | 6.403 | –0.104a | |
| I | 6.356 | (4.694b,c), 0.054d | |
| LL Ori | V | 11.499 | 0.018b, 0.021d |
| R | 10.835 | ||
| I | 10.218 | –0.184b, –0.038d | |
| MR Ori | V | 10.551 | 0.027b |
| R | 10.286 | ||
| I | 10.010 | –0.174b | |
Notes.
Compared to magnitude given by Ducati (2002);
compared to magnitude given by Da Rio et al. (2009);
the value given by Da Rio et al. (2009) for θ2 Ori B (mI = 11.050 mag) is clearly faulty;
compared to magnitudes given by Hillenbrand (1997).
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.